understanding politics, considerations

Israel in the European Union?


January 31st, 2007 · Europe, Iran, Israel and the Middle East, Judaism, Religion, World Affairs

Here’s the crazy idea of the day. Israeli Min­is­ter for Strate­gic Affairs Avig­dor Lieber­man thinks it’s a good idea:

Lieber­man told the Post that he was drawn by the cul­tural and demo­c­ra­tic link that exists between Israel and the EU, as well as the eco­nomic and secu­rity ben­e­fits that would be gained from such a union.

Given the strained and hos­tile rela­tions Israel has with its neigh­bors, it would do bet­ter to posi­tion itself as a mem­ber of a group of nations with whom it more nat­u­rally belongs. That’s par­tic­u­larly true in light of the ter­ror­ist threat that equally threat­ens both Israel and Europe, he said.

He also defended his posi­tion in a blog entry he wrote for the Post ear­lier this month.

Today’s world is divid­ing over val­ues. On the one side is the free, demo­c­ra­tic world, and on the other side is the rad­i­cal, fun­da­men­tal­ist world.

We might have dis­agree­ments with Europe and the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity over for­eign pol­icy, but we share the same val­ues sys­tem that is the tar­get of the rad­i­cal, fun­da­men­tal­ist war against the West,” Lieber­man wrote.

More­over, Israel is phys­i­cally very close to Europe, said Lieber­man. At its near­est point, “The EU is only half-an-hour away from Israel,” Lieber­man said.

There are numer­ous prob­lems with the idea, as the arti­cle mentions:

  • Israel may have to elim­i­nate the Law of Return and accept any immi­grants and work­ers from any other EU coun­try, whether they are Jews or not;
  • Israel, of course, is not in Europe;
  • The for­eign poli­cies of many Euro­pean coun­tries is neu­tral or some­times even anti-Israel; and
  • Israel’s spe­cial sit­u­a­tion as the sin­gle, Jew­ish state in the world would be com­pro­mised if its sov­er­eignty would decrease; and
  • Europe will likely become more Islamic in the medium– to long-term (see here and here), and Israel would prob­a­bly not want to remain an EU mem­ber then.

How­ever, there are a few advan­tages in the short– to medium-term:

  • Hav­ing other allies in addi­tion to the United States would be an good strate­gic move; and
  • The EU forces its coun­tries to under­take free-market eco­nomic reforms, and these would vastly improve Israel’s econ­omy (which has been start­ing to grow more quickly) over time.

Still, this idea also has the poten­tial to divide Israel’s Ashke­nazi (from East­ern Europe), Sephardic (from Spain and Portugal) and Mizrahi (from the Mid­dle East) Jews. Most Israeli Jews who are rich, pow­er­ful and influ­en­tial are Ashke­nazim whose think Israel should resem­ble a Euro­pean coun­try. Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews tend to be lower-class and think Israel’s cul­ture should be sim­i­lar to the Arab and Mid­dle East­ern worlds.

Although these sub­groups have mixed in recent years through inter­mar­riage, there is still some class-and culture-based hos­til­ity between them. If Israel applied to join the EU, then that would be seen as an endorse­ment of the Euro­cen­tric view of the Ashke­nazim. I’m not sure the Mizrahim (and pos­si­bly the Sephardim) would accept that.

Although Lieberman’s idea is inter­est­ing, I doubt it will go any­where. The EU, after all, needs to focus on its new mem­bers before it can even think about expand­ing again.