Considerations

Politics, business, religion, and culture by Samuel J. Scott and Jeff Guevin

Considerations header image 2

The Significance of 9/11

September 11th, 2007 · 7 Comments · Afghanistan, Civil Liberties, Culture, Europe, Iraq, Islam, Israel, Judaism, Law, Media, Politics, Religion, Russia, The Middle East, War on Terror

  • Google Buzz
  • Stumbleupon

september-11.jpg

Amer­i­cans lack his­tor­i­cal per­spec­tive:

Six years after the Sep­tem­ber 11 attacks on the United States, most Amer­i­cans view the plane hijack­ings that killed around 3,000 peo­ple as the most sig­nif­i­cant his­tor­i­cal event of their lives, accord­ing to a poll released Monday.

I would never down­play the tragedy of Sep­tem­ber 11, 2001 for a sec­ond. But it was not the most sig­nif­i­cant event in recent U.S. his­tory, much less all of Amer­i­can his­tory. In fact, by exag­ger­at­ing the sig­nifi­gance of that day, Amer­i­cans are doing exactly what Osama bin Laden wants.

Yes, three thou­sand peo­ple died on that day, the United States fell into a mod­er­ate reces­sion, and the United States invaded a Mid­dle East­ern coun­try (Afghanistan) that har­bored and aided those who were respon­si­ble. But those were the only direct effects of the ter­ror­ist attacks. Every­thing that came later — the Patriot Act, the War on Ter­ror, the inva­sion of Iraq, Guan­tanamo Bay — were only indi­rect results. Pres­i­dent Bush chose to pur­sue these actions, rightly or wrongly, in response to the attacks (and pos­si­bly with other motivations).

In the scope of recent world his­tory, Sep­tem­ber 11, 2001, in and of itself, pales in com­par­i­son to the sig­nifi­gance of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the col­lapse of the Soviet Union. The direct effects of this event — the for­mer led to the lat­ter — were that the entire world no longer lived under a fear of nuclear anni­hi­la­tion, that hun­dreds of mil­lions of peo­ple were no longer liv­ing under an author­i­tar­ian regime and now had a chance for democ­racy and that the United States could now spend less money on its mil­i­tary and invest in itself. I’m sure I’m miss­ing a few other things as well. With all due respect to the vic­tims of Sep­tem­ber 11, mild eco­nomic tur­moil and the deaths of 3,000 peo­ple can­not com­pare to the events of 1989 and 1991.

As far as other events in Amer­i­can his­tory, I’d also place World War II and Water­gate (both of which are still in liv­ing mem­ory) above Sep­tem­ber 11 in terms of sig­nif­i­cance. The effect of World War II, which includes the Cold War, the Holo­caust and led to the refound­ing of the State of Israel, should be obvi­ous. Water­gate poi­soned the U.S. polit­i­cal cli­mate and made an entire gen­er­a­tion of young peo­ple apa­thetic, indif­fer­ent or even hos­tile towards pol­i­tics, as well as untrust­ing of politi­cians. More than thirty years later, I’m still not sure we have recov­ered. This is not a sign of a healthy civil society.

If we exag­ger­ate the impor­tance of Sep­tem­ber 11, allow our minds to obssess over the attacks and change our lives significantly, then Osama bin Laden can pride­fully claim a larger vic­tory than he ever should have been allowed. And that will only inspire him and his ilk.

Ear­lier: The Causes of 9/11

Else­where: The Daily Show’s Jon Stew­art gave the best speech I’ve seen fol­low­ing that day: Any fool can blow some­thing up; to rebuild some­thing is extraordinary.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Eight Years Later
  2. The Berlin Wall
  3. Ter­ror­ism in Mumbai
  4. Read­ing List
  5. We’re Los­ing the War on Terror

Tags:

7 Comments so far ↓

  • Brad

    I have been wad­ing through 9–11 posts all day and I must say you have writ­ten a stand out post. This was thought pro­vok­ing, excel­lently writ­ten and a unique per­spec­tive. Thank you for the insight!  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Brooke

    I feel that the rea­son 9–11 is so sig­nif­i­cant is more so the fact that the nation came together and really showed unity in that time, rather that the attacks them­selves.  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Harry Upton`

    Reflec­tions on the 9–11 Attack

    The 9/11/2001 attack on the World Trade Cen­ter and the Pen­ta­gon was a major shock to our coun­try. We have had no exter­nal attack on our main­land since the 19th Cen­tury. We have had good rea­son to feel very secure.

    We have been attacked before dur­ing the last 100 years, but it was an attack on Hawaii, not the main­land. World War II started for us with the Japan­ese 1941 attack on Pearl Har­bor. The imme­di­ate deaths that resulted from that attack were about the same as those that hap­pened on 9–11. The bat­tles that fol­lowed and the results were not.

    There is no com­par­i­son of the strate­gic threat between the two. The Japan­ese were try­ing to destroy our Pacific fleet sta­tioned in Pearl Har­bor. They had already attacked and con­quered China and other South East Asian ter­ri­tory. They had allied them­selves with Hitler and Nazi Ger­many in order to dom­i­nate the the World. There was no ques­tion over the very real threat. They had mas­sive stand­ing armies and pow­er­ful indus­trial resources to sup­port them.

    The Al Quiada attack, although hor­ri­ble to expe­ri­ence, was not a strate­gic threat to our country’s well being. It is a ter­ror­ist dream to be able to cre­ate such havoc. That is their goal. Ter­ror­ists have no real power to do sus­tained dam­age to supe­rior oppo­nents. Their objec­tive is to pro­voke the power they attack into react­ing in a way that dam­ages itself.

    Al Quiada man­power, at that time, totaled no more than a few thou­sand mostly scat­tered over the Arab world. Their strat­egy was sim­ple. Devise a plan that involved as few par­tic­i­pants as pos­si­ble to invoke as much shock and dam­age as pos­si­ble. Unfor­tu­nately for us, their plan worked even bet­ter than they could have hoped. Unfor­tu­nately for them, it was plan that was dif­fi­cult to repeat as demon­strated by the pas­sen­ger rebel­lion that thwarted the fourth plane from reach­ing it’s tar­get. They have not been able to con­ceive and mount a pro­por­tion­ate follow-up attack.

    Pres­i­dent Bush did mount a plan to go after bin Laden in Afghanistan that made effec­tive use of resources but did not secure the gains made. Unfor­tu­nately, he ignored the strong inter­na­tional sup­port grow­ing out of the 9–11 attack. Ide­ally we would have mounted a joint polit­i­cal effort to erode the sources of ter­ror­ist sup­port. This com­bi­na­tion of mil­i­tary and polit­i­cal power is the only way to defeat terrorists.

    Instead, Mr. Bush chose to seek power and oil in the mid­dle east by mis­lead­ing the Amer­i­can peo­ple into back­ing an attack on Iraq. This was a major strate­gic mis­take. Al Quiada recruit­ing increased. Our country’s strate­gic losses have mounted since that deci­sion was made.

    Our loyal cit­i­zenry has suf­fered enor­mously. Many have lost hus­bands and wives. All of us have been bur­dened by nearly a tril­lion dol­lars in added national debt. Regret­tably, the United States no longer has a strong moral lead­er­ship posi­tion in the World.

    The Sep­tem­ber 11, 2001 ter­ror­ist attack on the United States was shock­ing. It should not have been a strate­gic threat to the United States. It only did long term dam­age to our coun­try because we failed to fol­low our announced strat­egy of defeat­ing Al Quiada ter­ror­ism. Our lead­er­ship allowed it to hap­pen.  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • steve

    9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Ben

    As the dis­cus­sion revolves around the his­tor­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance of 9/11 and one of the com­men­ta­tors above goes to great lengths to explain that the USA has never had an attack on the main­land since the 1900’s — I’d just like to keep the his­tor­i­cal record straight by point­ing out that the main­land was indeed attacked by the Japan­ese on the 23rd of Feb 1942. The ‘Ell­wood Shelling’ saw the Japan­ese try to destroy an oil pro­duc­tion facil­ity at Santa Bar­bara Ca by fir­ing upon it from a Sub­ma­rine.  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ben

    And just to keep my own his­tor­i­cal record straight, I should point out that I gave the wrong e-mail address :) it shoudl be bengoodwin@y7mail.com  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sam Scott

    Good point, Ben. Peo­ple for­get that.  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Comment

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes