Considerations

World politics, marketing leads, and financial help from throughout the globe

Considerations header image 2

Feminism’s Effect on Society

October 20th, 2007 · No Comments · Culture, Dating, Feminism, Liberal Pundits, Politics, Sex

Not only is Amer­i­can soci­ety becom­ing fem­i­nized, as Bill Maher hilar­i­ously points out in the above YouTube clip – it is also occur­ring in Britain:

Back in the Nineties, embold­ened by the suc­cesses of fem­i­nism, women sought to slay the dragon of patri­archy by turn­ing men into ridicu­lous cissies who would cry with them through chick-flicks and then cook up a decent lasagne.

Sud­denly, women wanted to drive home their new­found equal­ity by mould­ing men to be more like them…

Now, over a decade later, women are wak­ing up to the fact that these men are drippy, sex­less bores. The fem­i­ni­sa­tion of men hasn’t pro­duced the well-rounded uber-males women were hop­ing for.

Instead, women are now lumped with flabby inver­te­brates, lit­tle more than door­mats, whom they secretly despise but are too proud to admit it…

Men are now gen­er­ally ter­ri­fied of women. They hold their tongues for fear of being mis­in­ter­preted as sex­ist; they con­stantly attempt to sec­ondguess their part­ner in order to avoid giv­ing offence.

They preen them­selves with groan­ing shelves full of beauty prod­ucts so they won’t incur deri­sion and scorn. They sup­press their mas­culin­ity and present them­selves as cud­dly Mr Nice Guys, and won’t project self– con­fi­dence in case it’s regarded as unre­con­structed machismo.

This back­fir­ing fem­i­nist con­spir­acy has, of course, devel­oped hand in hand with the march of rag­ing polit­i­cal cor­rect­ness in Britain. The two have com­bined like some potent chem­i­cal reac­tion to explode in the faces of a gen­er­a­tion of women who thought that a ‘moulded’ man would make for a desir­able one.

In recent years, men have been trained like cir­cus seals to be inof­fen­sive to women, and no longer know how to entice them and turn them on.

But women secretly long for a man with swag­ger, who is cocky and self­as­sured and has the cheek to stand up them and make fun of their fem­i­nine foibles.

Although the author, Nir­pal Dhali­wal, loses his cred­i­bil­ity when he essen­tially brags about cheat­ing on his wife, he still makes some excel­lent observations.

Ear­lier: The Bat­tle of the Sexes, When Men Are Por­trayed as Idiots

Now Avail­able: E-Book down­load: “Let­ters from Israel: An Amer­i­can journalist’s adven­tures in the Holy Land.”

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Pales­tin­ian Society
  2. How Busi­ness Helps Society
  3. How Demo­graph­ics May Change Society
  4. How Cam­era Phones Change Society
  5. Mater­nity Leave

Tags:

No Comments so far ↓

  • boatangdemetriou

    Hmmm. Bit gen­er­al­is­ing isn’t it? What’s eat­ing you about fem­i­nism and women’s rights?

    I can’t say as I’ve encoun­tered that many man-hating fem­i­nazis in real­ity. It’s usu­ally a “straw man” enemy made up to use as a scape­goat for society’s ills.

    John

    http://boatangdemetriou.wordpress.com/  (Quote)

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sam Scott

    Of course, it’s gen­er­al­iz­ing. It is impos­si­ble to talk about soci­etal trends with­out gen­er­al­iz­ing. Of course there are excep­tions to every rule and obser­va­tion, but a trend is can be said to be gen­er­ally true when it is cor­rect a major­ity of the time.

    I have noth­ing against fem­i­nism or women’s rights. I think men and women are equal. But prob­lems occur when peo­ple — usu­ally fem­i­nists — start to state that men and women are the same. This is patently false to any­one with even a casual abil­ity to observe.  (Quote)

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dana

    This blog is extremely dis­turb­ing. I am a woman, who was raised in a white-middle class fam­ily. My par­ents were part­ners. My moth­ers PLACE in the home was where ever it best suited the fam­ily as a whole. Some­times that meant in school, obtain­ing 3 degrees.
    I con­sider myself to be an inde­pen­dant per­son, not an inde­pen­dant female. By dis­cussing such con­cerns in a mat­ter of male and female only pro­lif­er­ates the con­cepts of seg­re­ga­tion. Bio­log­i­cally, we are dif­fer­ent, men­tally we are dif­fer­ent, but so is one man from another, one cul­ture from another, one race from another. They key point to all activism per­tain­ing to the rights of peo­ple is that all are treated as equal. Because truth­fully, before we are any­thing else, we are human. There are no infe­ri­ors or superiors.….……to say that there are, sug­gests that pre­vi­ous out­dated men­tal­i­ties of racism, clas­sism, seg­re­ga­tion were true and right. Although the slow progress made to over­come these aspects has been mon­u­men­tal. The expressed thoughts are so gen­eral and shovin­is­tic it is offensive.

    To say that the focus of fem­i­nism is to train a man, is ludi­crous. It has noth­ing to do with sappy movies and lasagna, i dont want a man to be more like me, and fur­ther more, dont nec­es­sar­ily need or want a man. whether a man is drippy or sex­less is his prob­lem and sounds like an issue spring­ing from a bad marriage.

    There should be a healthy fear of being sex­ist. The truth is, as a PERSON we are no dif­fer­ent. If your entire exis­tence and place in this world, that allots you your rights as an indi­vid­ual, the com­pen­sa­tion for work, the respect from soci­ety and peers, comes from whats in your pants. Then we have a problem.

    Humans make up the ratio­nal pop­u­la­tion of the world. The entire con­cept of one and the other ( man and the woman) is only a sub­con­cious way to cat­e­go­rize, sep­a­rate and there for place some­one higher or lower than you. If this men­tal­ity were to be taken away. And every PERSON was seen as just that, you could assume nothing.

    The state­ment that men have been trained to be cir­cus seals, says to me that 1. some­one trained them, 2. they were train­able — so lack­ing direc­tion and knowl­edge and con­fi­dence to do oth­er­wise, and that if they WERE trained to be inof­fen­sive, then there was a rec­og­niz­able offense in the first place.

    Train­ing some­one to be some­thing other than what they essen­tially are, I con­sider to be amoral. Enlight­en­ing a per­son about dif­fer­ent per­spec­tives that may be seen as closer to a humane truth and neces­sity is a lit­tle bet­ter. to say the least.

    Per­son­ally, for a woman to long for a man, is detri­men­tal to her­self. and like­wise for a man. To long for any­thing exem­pli­fies a void in per­sonal con­tent­ment. Nobody NEEDS to have a wife or husband.

    The idea of a “man with swag­ger, who is cocky and self­as­sured and has the cheek to stand up them and make fun of their fem­i­nine foibles.” dis­gusts me.

    what an arro­gant state­ment. Fem­i­nine Foibles? what is that? do men not have their pitfalls?

    And once again the only way to dis­tance our­selves from any pro­lif­er­a­tion of sex­ism, homophopia, racism, clas­sism and so forth is to remove the con­cept of seper­a­tion and cat­e­go­riza­tion, and real­ize that all humans are the same, with dif­fer­ent cul­tures, charc­ter­is­tics, pref­er­ences, beliefs, opin­ions, etc. etc, etc.

    It takes all sorts to make the world turn. Nobody is supe­rior or infe­rior. They are just dif­fer­ent, and thank god for that. If every­one were the same the rich­ness of life would not exist.  (Quote)

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2bAman

    I find this inter­est­ing because in canada, the for­mer colony fol­lows the pat­tern of the found­ing coun­try, Britain.

    As a non-white male who was for­merly open to any view­point here’s what I found:

    A les­bian hates you because she thinks you’re gay/bi-sexual-so that means you’re try­ing to steal her part­ner. This is despite the fact that you are a straight man.

    A fem­i­nist hates you because a female video­g­ra­pher insists on car­ry­ing the equip­ment while you carry the tri­pod. It’s not good enough.

    A white woman tells you that her office of 95% white females do not want a non-white man in the office.

    You con­stantly see white women in canada being hired because they are exactly what they are, and yet they don’t do the job any bet­ter than a man or a non-white woman.

    Need­less to say, women have for­got­ten how to be women, and men have given up their man­hood because of rad­i­cal fem­i­nism.  (Quote)

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anto

    Bull­shits, 2baman. Yours are the same gen­der con­cep­tu­al­iza­tion that thinks that it needs to be a cocky man or the women will eat you up and they need to be dom­i­nated. What about peace and being against that extrem fem­i­nism JUST because those par­tic­u­lar women are bul­lies and not for equal­ity and not men vs women?  (Quote)

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Comment

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes