As a non-white male who was formerly open to any viewpoint here’s what I found:

A lesbian hates you because she thinks you’re gay/bi-sexual-so that means you’re trying to steal her partner. This is despite the fact that you are a straight man.

A feminist hates you because a female videographer insists on carrying the equipment while you carry the tripod. It’s not good enough.

A white woman tells you that her office of 95% white females do not want a non-white man in the office.

You constantly see white women in canada being hired because they are exactly what they are, and yet they don’t do the job any better than a man or a non-white woman.

Needless to say, women have forgotten how to be women, and men have given up their manhood because of radical feminism.

To say that the focus of feminism is to train a man, is ludicrous. It has nothing to do with sappy movies and lasagna, i dont want a man to be more like me, and further more, dont necessarily need or want a man. whether a man is drippy or sexless is his problem and sounds like an issue springing from a bad marriage.

There should be a healthy fear of being sexist. The truth is, as a PERSON we are no different. If your entire existence and place in this world, that allots you your rights as an individual, the compensation for work, the respect from society and peers, comes from whats in your pants. Then we have a problem.

Humans make up the rational population of the world. The entire concept of one and the other ( man and the woman) is only a subconcious way to categorize, separate and there for place someone higher or lower than you. If this mentality were to be taken away. And every PERSON was seen as just that, you could assume nothing.

The statement that men have been trained to be circus seals, says to me that 1. someone trained them, 2. they were trainable — so lacking direction and knowledge and confidence to do otherwise, and that if they WERE trained to be inoffensive, then there was a recognizable offense in the first place.

Training someone to be something other than what they essentially are, I consider to be amoral. Enlightening a person about different perspectives that may be seen as closer to a humane truth and necessity is a little better. to say the least.

Personally, for a woman to long for a man, is detrimental to herself. and likewise for a man. To long for anything exemplifies a void in personal contentment. Nobody NEEDS to have a wife or husband.

The idea of a “man with swagger, who is cocky and selfassured and has the cheek to stand up them and make fun of their feminine foibles.” disgusts me.

what an arrogant statement. Feminine Foibles? what is that? do men not have their pitfalls?

And once again the only way to distance ourselves from any proliferation of sexism, homophopia, racism, classism and so forth is to remove the concept of seperation and categorization, and realize that all humans are the same, with different cultures, charcteristics, preferences, beliefs, opinions, etc. etc, etc.

It takes all sorts to make the world turn. Nobody is superior or inferior. They are just different, and thank god for that. If everyone were the same the richness of life would not exist.

I have nothing against feminism or women’s rights. I think men and women are equal. But problems occur when people — usually feminists — start to state that men and women are the same. This is patently false to anyone with even a casual ability to observe.

I can’t say as I’ve encountered that many man-hating feminazis in reality. It’s usually a “straw man” enemy made up to use as a scapegoat for society’s ills.

John

http://boatangdemetriou.wordpress.com/