Guys seem to be taking their dating marbles and going home:
Guyland is the world in which young men live. It is both a stage of life, a liminal undefined time span between adolescence and adulthood that can often stretch for a decade or more, and a place, or, rather, a bunch of places where guys gather to be guys with each other, unhassled by the demands of parents, girlfriends, jobs, kids, and the other nuisances of adult life. In this topsy-turvy, Peter-Pan mindset, young men shirk the responsibilities of adulthood and remain fixated on the trappings of boyhood, while the boys they still are struggle heroically to prove that they are real men despite all evidence to the contrary.
So writes sociologist Michael Kimmel, author of the new book “Guyland.” As a twentysomething guy who used to live in the college town of Boston, I’m not surprised at his findings. I would see this all the time in the neighborhoods of Allston and Brighton, where recent graduates and young professionals would live exactly the way Kimmel describes.
People will only do something if they believe that the reward is worth the risk. People do a subconscious cost-benefit analysis for nearly every possible action that they may take. It seems that twentysomething and thirtysomething guys may have decided that marriage, and perhaps even traditional dating, is no longer worth it.
And feminism is to blame. Or, more specifically, the unintended consequences of feminism.
Men used to be the primary providers. Our social upbringing and natural instincts motivated us to gain an education, work hard, and ensure that our future wives and families would be secure. And we were happy to have this role. It made us feel useful, productive, and appreciated. However, in recent decades, women have become just as educated and successful as men. So now men have little motivation to work and study hard enough to have the ability to care for anything beyond our personal needs and wants. Since we can devote less time to being productive, we can focus more on sports, the Internet, and bars. On a subconscious level, the original role that men once played in society no longer exists, so we are now unsure of our place. So we are now aimless and directionless.
But there is more to it. Women themselves have changed, and the response of men has been almost entirely negative. As Ph.D. student Ken Mondschein notes in this essay in his excellent “History of Single Life” series, the idea of “social capital” figures prominently in the dating world. Men and women want to secure a mate that is as high on the social ladder as possible. For men, sex appeal plays a large role; for women, it is monetary resources and social assets. As I note in a lengthy essay, women become more picky as they become more successful because they always want to date “up” in terms of social capital. In Guyland, men are seeming to withdraw from the dating world rather than play a game that is now stacked against them. There is also a related issue: girls are acting in a way that is similar to guys. I cannot count the number of twentysomething women I know who are also actively avoiding serious relationships because they just want “to have fun,” or they want to focus only on their educations and careers. (A 27-year-old friend of mine broke up with her wonderful boyfriend to go to graduate school across the country. Essentially, she chose to prioritize her career over her relationship.)
But there is still more. Feminism made pornography and female promiscuity both permissible and common, and this has had a negative effect on the dating world. Men no longer need to make an effort and promise a relationship in order to obtain sex. If a woman wants to take it slow, then many guys, unfortunately, will immediately move on to countless others who will not. But, in the end, easy access to free pornography on the Internet mave have done the most damage. If a guy can, if you’ll excuse me, pleasure himself in a few minutes and then go out to play football with the guys, why should he spend countless hours and money enduring stressful and frustrating dating games to woo a picky woman in order to obtain the same result? In a rational cost-benefit analysis, perhaps dating itself is no longer worth it to men.
And this apathy also extends to marriage itself. In a world in which many, if not most, marriages end in divorce, why should a man risk getting married when he might lose his children and half of his assets even though his wife likely makes as much (or more) money as he does? Family law needs to be updated for the modern world.
The existence of Guyland proves the central theme of my earlier essay: As a result of feminism, men and women have become so independent and separated that they no longer need each other. I’m not sure if there is a way out from here.
Elsewhere: Why Someone is Leaving ‘Guyland’
Related posts:




Very interesting. As a NON-feminist lesbian myself, I have observed this division of the genders in my hetero friends/couples. The very identity of the “man” has been shredded…who do we have to look up to anymore? It’s not the minivan man (see my article that is not far off yours!).
(Quote)
Successful sons of single moms.…
(Quote)
Male Spinsters « Samuel J. Scott // Oct 14, 2008 at 07:22
Male Spinsters « Samuel J. Scott // Oct 14, 2008 at 07:22
The Selfish Generation « Samuel J. Scott // Feb 14, 2009 at 21:01
Female Unhappiness « Samuel J. Scott // May 26, 2009 at 21:28
The Upcoming Generational War « Samuel J. Scott // Sep 12, 2009 at 20:03
The Upcoming Generational War | Considerations by Samuel J. Scott // Dec 28, 2009 at 04:30
The Selfish Generation | Considerations by Samuel J. Scott // Jan 4, 2010 at 01:44
bro thanks for your ideas, I have to write an essay about guyland for an English 101 class, and I don’t exactly agree with everything that he says in the book. Thanks for at least giving me a starting point
(Quote)