understanding politics, considerations

Men Living at Home


July 24th, 2009 · Business, Economics, and Finance, Dating and Relationships, Europe, Great Britain and Ireland, Israel and the Middle East, World Affairs

living at homeRISHON LEZION, Israel — One-third of British men under forty are report­edly liv­ing with par­ents:

Cost was the main fac­tor for 59 per cent of them, but 57 per cent of women and 16 per cent of men also admit­ted that they liked being looked after by mum. Another 11 per cent of men said they would miss their par­ents too much if they left.

A lucky 56 per cent of adults who live at home get their meals cooked for them, while 55 per cent admit­ted that mum still does their washing.

Eigh­teen per cent even had their packed lunch made for them every morning.

With such pam­per­ing, many have no inten­tion of leav­ing any time soon.

Nine­teen per cent said they would stay until they became fed up with their par­ents and another 30 per cent intended to stay at home until they wanted to move in with a boyfriend or girlfriend.

One of the dif­fer­ences I have noticed between Israel and the United States is the atti­tude that peo­ple have towards liv­ing with fam­i­lies. Israel is a more-traditional coun­try that places a great empha­sis on fam­ily, but Amer­ica has always been an indi­vid­u­al­is­tic coun­try whose soci­ety has always encour­aged peo­ple to leave home early and make some­thing of them­selves. In Israel, liv­ing with par­ents is com­mon; in the United States, it is a sign of failure.

Nearly every twen­tysome­thing per­son I know — male or female — in Israel lives with his or her par­ents. The rea­sons are numer­ous. Wages are typ­i­cally lower here. Min­i­mum wage for a full-time job is the equiv­a­lent of $5.50 an hour, and even edu­cated, non-management work­ers in the high-tech indus­try earn the equiv­a­lent of $2,000 a month before taxes. These lower wages come with higher taxes than in the United States to fund the country’s uni­ver­sal health-care sys­tem, and big-ticket items such as rent, elec­tron­ics, and cloth­ing can cost as much in in Amer­ica as well.

In addi­tion, those Israelis who do go to col­lege take longer to fin­ish their degrees. Nearly every­one serves in the mil­i­tary after high school until the age of twenty (for women) and twenty-one (for men). Then most peo­ple spend a year or more trav­el­ing through­out the world before set­tling down back in Israel. So they start col­lege at twenty-two or later. More­over, most Israelis study part-time while work­ing full-time. Unlike Amer­i­cans, Israelis do not want to take on student-loan debt — so they pay for it them­selves through work­ing and liv­ing at home. As a result of all these rea­sons, young peo­ple do not live on their own.

It is very likely that this phe­nom­e­non will spread to the West­ern world, at least for men, as well. First of all, more men then women are suf­fer­ing as a result of the ongo­ing eco­nomic tur­moil. Fields such as edu­ca­tion, health-care, non-profit, and gov­ern­ment — those that tend to attract women — are not as affected by the finan­cial col­lapse as the fields of man­u­fac­tur­ing, finance, and busi­ness — those that tend to attract men. Fewer men are going to col­lege as well.

Although the rea­son for this soci­etal change is neg­a­tive, I think the end result might be ben­e­fi­cial for the West. Much of the prob­lems that plague mod­ern, Amer­i­can soci­ety stem from extreme indi­vid­u­al­ism. More men and women are choos­ing to live a sin­gle life of pur­ported fun rather than get mar­ried. Men are choos­ing to live in a “Guy­land” of imma­ture hedo­nism rather than act respon­si­bly. Part of the rea­son for the eco­nomic tur­moil is the self­ish desire of finance man­agers to earn as much obscene profit as pos­si­ble regard­less of the risk to their firms and soci­ety as a whole. Middle-aged Amer­i­cans put their par­ents in nurs­ing homes rather than take care of them as peo­ple through­out the non-Western world do. In an extreme exam­ple, cus­tomers at an Indi­ana con­ve­nience store ignored a clerk who had been shot in a rob­bery and con­tin­ued to shop rather than help him.

In such an envi­ron­ment, the United States should wel­come a return to fam­ily and close­ness rather than indi­vid­ual suc­cess at any cost.