JERUSALEM -- The big news of the day -- and it is potentially explosive indeed -- is the European Union's reported endorsement of Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state:
The 27 EU foreign ministers are scheduled to decide Tuesday on the final wording of a statement on the Middle East that may very well include European recognition of east Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state.
Efforts in Brussels on Monday to get a consensus on the text among the EU ambassadors failed, meaning the foreign ministers themselves will have to delve into the arguments over the text.
One Israeli official said it was very rare for a text this substantial to reach the foreign ministerial level without prior agreement.
The statement, which has just been allegedly passed, somewhat states the obvious since all outside parties have agreed that a two-state solution -- Israel and Palestine as two countries next to each other -- is the way to peace and have pressed both the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority towards that end.
But the devil, so to speak, is in the details. Although the Israeli Foreign Ministry is pleased that the statement purportedly recognizes Israel's claim to east Jerusalem -- the territory was annexed following the Six Day War in 1967 --the office also called for the EU to "promote direct negotiations between the parties, while considering Israel's security needs and understanding that Israel's Jewish character must be preserved in any future agreement." This is an important point: The Palestinians have yet to recognize the existence of Israel as a Jewish state.
Moreover, Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat -- a secular, former high-tech businessman who leans right politically -- bashed the EU proposal:
In response to the Swedish proposal currently being debated by European Union foreign ministers in Belgium that would declare east Jerusalem the capital of a future Palestinian state, Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat on Monday sent an official letter to the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Catherine Ashton, in which he insisted that Jerusalem remain united "as the eternal capital of the State of Israel."
"Throughout the history of the world, there is not one important city that was divided that functioned successfully," Barkat wrote. "They either reunited or ceased to function properly. The lesson is too clear. Jerusalem must stay united."
Barkat added that "division focuses on differences rather than the common denominator that unites people of all faiths," and identified Jerusalem as "the heart and soul of the Jewish people."
On a personal note, I can say that the mayor is being consistent. I attended a Q&A with Barkat at a gathering of English-speaking Israelis during the 2008 mayoral campaign, and he said the exact same sentiment. This is also an important point: Can a divided city ever function properly?
It is also hard to imagine the hatred that many Israelis have for Europeans in general, especially following their perceived (rightly or wrongly) support for Hamas during the Gaza conflict late last year:
This [EU statement] is known in the trade as a slap in the face. Since coming to power, Netanyahu’s government eased up on checkpoints and military presence in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria, has supported and protected Mahmoud Abbas and his government, have slowed and now frozen virtually all settlement construction while being far more cautious about construction of Jewish homes in Jerusalem as well as destruction of Palestinian homes. In return, Israel has had to swallow the Goldstone Report, the Swedish “IDF Steals Body Parts” attack with no apology from the government and now this...
Europe should really stay out of it. They have done enough damage with their constant funding for NGOs that oppose Israel, for their blind support of the Palestinians and relative silence over Hamas and Gazan attacks on Israeli civilian targets and the constant pressure presented from their courts over potential arrests of Israeli leaders.
This is also an important point. Both Israel and the Palestinians need to respect those who are trying to mediate the conflict. If even one party does not trust the mediator, then negotiations are useless. Europe -- except, perhaps, for France ever since the election of President Nicolas Sarkozy -- is perceived by Israelis as being anti-Israel as much as the United States has been seen as being pro-Israel. Can such outsiders ever implement or even produce a peace agreement, or is it something that Israelis and Palestinians can only reach on their own?
Moreover, if the alleged plans to announce a State of Palestine soon with east Jerusalem as its capital occur -- as PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyed might be planning -- but produce no real results, will that lead to a third intifada and a return to Square One?
Now Available: E-Book download: "Letters from Israel: An American journalist’s adventures in the Holy Land."
Related posts:
“Can a divided city ever function properly? … Can such outsiders ever implement or even produce a peace agreement, or is it something that Israelis and Palestinians can only reach on their own?”
Methinks not.
On details:
The EU prudently avoided talk of a divided Jerusalem, going so far, as you point out, as only to state the obvious: “S’il doit y avoir une paix réelle, il est nécessaire de trouver par la négociation un moyen de résoudre le statut de Jérusalem comme future capitale de deux Etats” (http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2009/12/08/les-europeens-appellent-a-une-negociation-sur-le-statut-de-jerusalem_1277874_3218.html#ens_id=1228030 )
Palestinians needn’t recognize Israel as a Jewish state – after all, no-one else has, and Israelis themselves are divided on the point. Jeff(Quote)