Considerations

Politics, business, religion, and culture by Samuel J. Scott and Jeff Guevin

Considerations header image 1

West-Bank Settlements

February 9th, 2010 · Anti-Semitism, Civil Liberties, Islam, Israel, Judaism, Law, Palestine, Personal, Politics, Religion, The Middle East

JERUSALEM — Hil­lel Halkin makes a not-so-modest pro­posal for peace in the Mid­dle East:

There is one obvi­ous solu­tion for Israel’s West Bank set­tle­ments that has been all but com­pletely over­looked: Let the set­tlers con­tinue liv­ing where they are, but in the state of Palestine.

As a con­cep­tion, it’s stun­ningly sim­ple. Its very obvi­ous­ness has ren­dered it invis­i­ble, like some­thing in one’s field of vision that goes unno­ticed because it has been there all the time. If over one mil­lion Pales­tin­ian Arabs can live as they do in towns and vil­lages all over Israel, why can­not a few hun­dred thou­sand Israeli Jews live, sym­met­ri­cally, in a West Bank Pales­tin­ian state?

I once made a sim­i­lar pro­posal. After all, the alter­na­tives are either impos­si­ble or dan­ger­ous. As I observed per­son­ally, the major set­tle­ments just beyond the Green Line and are too large to evac­u­ate or move. Israel would never agree to a sin­gle, bi-national state because such a coun­try would soon cease to be a Jew­ish state because of higher Palestinian-birthrates or implode into civil war.

Part of the debate has also struck me as dis­crim­i­na­tory. Arabs — Pales­tini­ans or not, depend­ing on how each chooses to define him­self — have always lived as full cit­i­zens in the State of Israel with vot­ing rights and com­plete equal­ity under the law. Why, then, is there such a demand that no Jews can live in the West Bank at all? It does not seem fair.

If there is to be a two-state solu­tion, plac­ing all set­tle­ments and out­posts under the legal juris­dic­tion and sov­er­eignty of a future State of Pales­tine would be an equi­table solu­tion (as long as Jews there would have as much rights as Arabs in Israel). Still, Jews liv­ing in those places may not want to remain under such a sce­nario. They might leave — mak­ing the entire issue moot.

If this change of juris­dic­tion will not occur, then the only other pos­si­bil­ity would be for Israel to give a future, Pales­tin­ian state pieces of land to com­pen­sate for those taken by the major settlements.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

Strong Atheists, Chill Out!

February 9th, 2010 · Uncategorized

A col­umn from the LA Times from a while back  that says what I’ve wanted to say about strong athe­ism for a long time (and prob­a­bly better).

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

Dating in the Stone Age

February 9th, 2010 · Culture, Dating, Feminism, Health, Politics, Sex

Your required-reading for the day: Char­lotte Allen writes a lengthy essay on the mod­ern, sin­gles scene in the West, which she, per­haps iron­i­cally, believes is a throw­back to tens of thou­sands of years ago as a result of fem­i­nism; tech­nol­ogy; game-playing, Alpha males; sexually-liberated, suc­cess­ful women; ignored, Beta males; delayed mar­riage; extended ado­les­cence; and a hook-up culture.

Here are my thoughts on the same subject.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 1 CommentTags:

A Blog

February 8th, 2010 · Administrative, Blogroll, Blogs From Left to Right

I’d like to see The Volokh Con­spir­acy (sam­ple blog) on our blogroll, not because I’m a lib­er­tar­ian, but because I think they nicely bal­ance out my own China-is-taking-over-without-anyone-noticing ten­den­cies and Sam’s America-is-going-down-rise-of-the-East tendencies.

Thoughts?

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

The Death of Food

February 8th, 2010 · Business, Europe, Food, Global Warming, Globalization, The Boston Globe

French tra­di­tional cheeses dying out?  Say it ain’t so!

Still another vic­tim of globalization.

Don’t get me wrong: glob­al­iza­tion has its perks, and I’m not going to be riot­ing at G8 or WTO con­fer­ences any­time in the fore­see­able future, but Big Gov­ern­ment, Big Ag, and super­mar­kets are killing small farms and diver­sity of palate.

The old phrase “à cha­cun son goût” (each to his or her own taste) is rapidly los­ing mean­ing.  The arti­cle calls this phe­nom­e­non “the creep­ing homog­e­niza­tion of the global palate.”  They also allude to the causes, but it seems, they take them for granted.

First, Big Gov­ern­ment: Yes, thanks to pas­teur­iza­tion, beer is now safe to drink (the orig­i­nal pur­pose), and you have some guar­an­tee that your milk is TB-free.  On the other hand, gov­ern­ments are killing the folks that pro­duce raw milk and raw milk prod­ucts though health mea­sures of dubi­ous value and sub­si­diza­tion of Big Ag.  That La Belle France has allowed this to hap­pen chez eux is a travesty.

Sec­ond, Big Ag.  Accord­ing to the arti­cle, 14% of French fam­ily farms dis­ap­peared between 2000 and 2004, leav­ing just over 100,000 at that point.  “Dozens” of arti­sanal, family-made cheeses have been lost.

In our own coun­try, and of course our coun­try is the global leader in global cor­po­ra­ti­za­tion, over 80% of our agri­cul­ture is owned by a hand­ful of cor­po­ra­tions.  Big Ag con­tributes to global warm­ing and is fight­ing the cli­mate change bill.  What’s ironic is that they con­tinue to use family-farm iconog­ra­phy when they speak to the public.

What’s real is that a quar­ter of the prod­ucts in a gro­cery store are made from corn, and corn is used in every­thing from ethanol to gyp­sum wall­board to shoe pol­ish to tex­tiles.  All this, while dairy farm­ers go broke and sell their farms.

Finally, the super­mar­ket.  I live in a small town in a small agri­cul­tural state.  We have a mar­ket in town.  It’s a co-op.  It has about 99% of what I need in any given week, from toi­let paper to tor­tilla chips.  There are a few things they don’t have, things I gen­er­ally just do without.

I go to a school that’s top-ranked for its envi­ron­men­tal focus.  Most of the stu­dents are what you’d call “greens” and are lefter than Den­nis Kucinich.  Yet, where do they do their gro­cery shop­ping?  20 miles away in a strip-development town that’s only acces­si­ble by car – even once you’re there.

It’s time for a change, folks.  Big Ag, Big Gov­ern­ment, and an obses­sion with “con­ve­nience” and “low prices” is mak­ing us fat­ter, killing the envi­ron­ment, and destroy­ing com­pe­ti­tion, the key­stone of cap­i­tal­ism.  You can fight these trends by buy­ing local, par­tic­i­pat­ing in gov­ern­ment, and more or less just THINKING about where the stuff you buy comes from and from whom you buy it.

(Michael Pol­lan, thank­fully, has writ­ten exten­si­bly and acces­si­bly about these phe­nom­ena, and the tide may be begin­ning to turn, but cer­tainly not quick enough for me or for those fancy French cheeses).

Also, if you care about good cheese and pou­vez lire le Français, or if you just want to see a funny cal­en­dar with pinup girls + cheese, visit the Asso­ci­a­tion Fro­mages de Ter­roirsSi vouz aimez le fro­mage, il faut le sauver du corporatisme!

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

Too Many Men

February 7th, 2010 · Business, China, Culture, Dating, Economics, Education, Feminism, Politics, Religion, Sex, The Middle East, War

Michael J. Tot­ten watches this YouTube video and makes an impor­tant point:

I don’t know much about demog­ra­phy, but Mar­tin Kramer makes a strong case in just a few short min­utes for the idea that a sur­plus of military-aged males is a big part of the Mid­dle East’s prob­lem right now and that it will even­tu­ally cor­rect itself.

Men have an innate need to be a part of some­thing larger than them­selves. They want to belong. They want to lead some­thing. They want to take charge. They have all this pent-up energy to make a dif­fer­ence, and in too many parts of the world, they do not have an out­let to do so. They want to feel impor­tant. They want to be a provider, in some capacity.

This real­ity — or lack thereof — plays itself out in dif­fer­ent ways in dif­fer­ent parts of the world. In inner-city Amer­ica, young men join gangs when they have lit­tle edu­ca­tion and even fewer job prospects. In the Mid­dle East, they join extrem­ist groups that offer a pur­pose in a part the world that cur­rently has few job prospects. In sub­ur­ban Amer­ica, they live in “Guy­land” — they sleep around, prey on women, work dead-end jobs, and play video-games in which they can exert some con­trol a the vir­tual world that they have cre­ated because they have no con­trol over the real one. For exam­ple, sev­eral friends of mine have said that they love the “Civ­i­liza­tion” computer-game series because it allows them to be the “mas­ter of their domain” when they are cur­rently pow­er­less in the cur­rent economy.

The biggest question-mark in this con­text is China. The coun­try has mil­lions of men who will never have wives because of a population-imbalance result­ing from a one-child pol­icy that led to par­ents killing female chil­dren through abor­tion or other means because a male child was cul­tur­ally viewed as more impor­tant than a female one. What will these men do? Exert their inner rage against the gov­ern­ment? Join the mil­i­tary and fight an enemy, who­ever it may be?

I also won­der how this will affect West­ern soci­ety, which is see­ing men out­num­bered at uni­ver­si­ties over women as well as men begin­ning to earn less on aver­age than female pro­fes­sion­als. Men are increas­ingly angry and agi­tated, and I fear where it may lead. These feel­ing that men have will need an outlet.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

Just people

February 5th, 2010 · Uncategorized

I think it’s easy for those who demo­nize Iran and its truly despotic, occa­sion­ally looney oli­garchy to for­get that Ira­ni­ans are not their gov­ern­ment. Ira­ni­ans are peo­ple, just like you and me, and they like Lost, too.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags: · · ·

You’re rich

February 5th, 2010 · Bible, Business, Economics, Finance, Philosophy, Politics

Do The Rich Deserve More Tax Breaks? asks Newsweek’s Daniel Gross.  That ques­tion has always vexed us, and will con­tinue to vex us.

In the end, it’s all about phi­los­o­phy: whether you think a fair share means the same per­cent­age of income, or whether you agree that “For of those to whom much is given, much is required.”

Regard­less, I’m inclined to agree with Mr. Gross: if you make over $250,o00 a year, get over your­self.  You’re rich.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

A quick rundown

February 5th, 2010 · Religion, Science, Sex, The Middle East, Uncategorized

I said it once; I’ll say it again: clearly, reli­gion is not the real cause of Islamic ter­ror­ism.  Debate me all you want, but I will insist and never be con­vinced that reli­gion is noth­ing more than a cloak donned by hyp­ocrites, liars, and the crim­i­nally insane.

Hope­fully, good news to come in Uganda, as the anti-homosexuality bill that has earned them so much appro­ba­tion may get the same treat­ment it pro­poses for gay people.

The death of a lan­guage always has sad­dened me a lit­tle.  I know it’s inevitable, that it’s part of evo­lu­tion and glob­al­iza­tion and human migra­tion.  I know that Bo wasn’t very use­ful a lan­guage in the mod­ern world, and that homog­e­niza­tion of lan­guage could lead to less con­flict.  Still… there’s some­thing mag­i­cal in that lit­tle lady’s song – a magic that’s now gone.

Oh, Pluto.  First you lose big planet sta­tus, now you’re melt­ing, reform­ing, and turn­ing red?

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

In the West Bank

February 3rd, 2010 · Bible, Business, Civil Liberties, Culture, Economics, Israel, Judaism, Law, Palestine, Personal, Politics, Religion, The Middle East, War, War on Terror

MAALE ADUMIM, the West Bank — So I was dri­ving with a friend from Jerusalem to Tel Aviv a few months ago, and we came to a secu­rity check­point after twenty min­utes. It was then that I real­ized that we were tak­ing a path dif­fer­ent from the one used by the buses — and that I was about to enter the West Bank for the first time.

route 443Route 443, which we had been tak­ing, is the quick­est way to get from Israel’s polit­i­cal cap­i­tal to its met­ro­pol­i­tan one. It goes through the part of the West Bank just north­west of Jerusalem. After Pales­tin­ian ter­ror­ists began attack­ing pass­ing vehi­cles with bombs and sniper-fire dur­ing the sec­ond intifada in the early 1990s, the Israeli gov­ern­ment blocked access to the high­way from Pales­tin­ian towns. Late last year, the Israeli Supreme Court ruled that the gov­ern­ment must allow Pales­tini­ans to use Route 443. (This pic­ture is from Wikipedia.)

As my friend and I approached the secu­rity check­point, she slowed down. As she drove through the check­point, an armed guard glanced our way. And that was it. We were back on our way. In Israel and the Occu­pied Ter­ri­to­ries, Israelis (Jews, Arabs, every­one) get yel­low license-plates while Pales­tini­ans receive green ones. So it’s easy to tell who is dri­ving a car.

As we drove through this part of the West Bank, I was struck by how nor­mal it seemed. Hon­estly, I did not know what to expect. Per­haps I thought we would have been stopped at some­thing like Pass­port Con­trol in inter­na­tional air­ports. Per­haps I thought we would be stopped and ques­tioned like that which occurs at El Al ter­mi­nals for every flight com­ing from or going to Israel. But, in real­ity, it was noth­ing. It was almost as though we were dri­ving from Mass­a­chu­setts to Con­necti­cut on the way to New York. In other words, it was all just a dif­fer­ent part of the same coun­try. More­over, once we were in the West Bank, the geog­ra­phy, archi­tec­ture, and loca­tions in that part of the ter­ri­tory were indis­tin­guish­able from those in Israel proper. All of the signs were in Hebrew, and most of the build­ings that we passed seemed to be owned and oper­ated by Israeli Jews. If it were not for the secu­rity check­point, I would have thought that I was merely in another part of Israel proper. After all, there is a pop­u­lar shopping-mall just off the road in the nearby settlement-city of Modi’in.

The sec­ond time I went through the West Bank, I was tak­ing a taxi from Jerusalem to Tel Aviv because I was extremely late for an appoint­ment. The taxi dri­ver, an Arab Israeli, asked me which route I wanted to take. I told him: “What­ever is quicker at this time of day.” I didn’t real­ize that this would mean another jour­ney through the West Bank — albeit a dif­fer­ent one altogether.

Once we left Jerusalem, I had thought we would take Route 443 again directly. I was wrong. The taxi dri­ver thought that another way would be quicker, and I trusted his judg­ment because I had hag­gled a flat rate — the quicker he got me to Tel Aviv, the bet­ter for him.

As it turned out, he took sev­eral smaller roads through the West Bank in order to avoid traf­fic con­ges­tion and get to Route 443 as soon as pos­si­ble. But I was ner­vous. A few min­utes after we left Jerusalem, we were in a part of the West Bank that I did not recognize.

All of the signs were in Ara­bic. All of the peo­ple walk­ing on the side­walks were Arabs. All of the cars had green license-plates. More­over, I was able to see first-hand the eco­nomic dis­par­ity between Israelis and Pales­tini­ans from the van­tage point of a taxi’s win­dow. This part of the West Bank was much poorer than Israel proper — the build­ings were in dis­re­pair, and there were more trash and lit­ter in the streets. This neigh­bor­hood resem­bled the poor, blue-collar, Israeli city of Lod — which is also known for the vio­lent con­fronta­tions that some­times occur between Arabs and Jews there.

And then, a few min­utes later, I saw a road sign that said Ramal­lah, the unof­fi­cial cap­i­tal of the Pales­tin­ian Author­ity and a past cen­ter of ter­ror­ist activ­ity, was only a few kilo­me­ters away in a given direc­tion. But before I became too stressed, the taxi dri­ver turned away from Ramal­lah and headed towards Route 443. I breathed a sigh of relief. I do not want to sound para­noid, but, after all, this is the Mid­dle East. Just to be safe, I had told the taxi dri­ver dur­ing our small-talk that I was an Amer­i­can tourist. I would not want an Arab taxi-driver tak­ing me through the West Bank to know that I was an Israeli cit­i­zen as well. It may be racist, but that is life in this part of the world.

The third time I was in the West Bank was ear­lier in the morn­ing a few days ago. I went with a friend who was tak­ing his daugh­ter to a park in Ma’ale Adu­mim, a suburb-settlement just over the Green Line between Jerusalem and the Dead Sea. When West­ern­ers think of the word “set­tle­ment,” they likely imag­ine a few pitched tents on a hill­top. Some­times this is true (and the Israeli gov­ern­ment calls them ille­gal or unau­tho­rized “out­posts”), but not in the case of Ma’ale Adu­mim. As of 2007, the set­tle­ment had 33,000 res­i­dents — more than my home­town of Belleville, Illi­nois — and there are insti­tu­tions like a shop­ping mall and library. It just seemed to be another ordi­nary, quiet suburb.

On the way back to Jerusalem, I real­ized that Ma’ale Adu­mim — and the three settlement-cities that are even larger — killed the tra­di­tional, two-state solu­tion. Most main­stream com­men­ta­tors and ana­lysts have always posited that such a peace needs three agreements:

  • Pales­tini­ans stop all vio­lence and rec­og­nize Israel as a Jew­ish state
  • Jerusalem is divided
  • Israel with­draws from all ter­ri­tory beyond the Green Line (which was orig­i­nally the cease-fire line between Israel and Jor­dan in 1948)

From what I have seen, the third stip­u­la­tion is now impos­si­ble. The peo­ple of Ma’ale Adu­mim are not going any­where. Get­ting them to leave would be like the mayor of Boston ask­ing an entire neigh­bor­hood to pack and get out. It’s not going to hap­pen. The so-called “facts on the ground” are indeed the facts on the ground.

Ma'ale Adumim

It is a com­mon view that the peo­ple who live in set­tle­ments are all reli­gious Zion­ists because most of the major, bib­li­cal events occurred in the West Bank (also known as Judea and Samaria), but that is not entirely accu­rate. The ones who live on “out­posts” deep in the West Bank are usu­ally reli­gious, but those near the Green Line in places like Ma’ale Adu­mim are a mix of reli­gious peo­ple and those who want cheaper rent. Israel has one of the high­est lev­els of income-disparity in the world.

The lower prices are under­stand­able since the mar­ket is tak­ing higher risk into account. Of course, there is a slightly-higher risk of ter­ror­ist attacks, but the greater vari­able is likely that the prop­erty itself is unsta­ble. No one really knows what will occur in these areas in the com­ing years or decades. It is pos­si­ble — but not likely — that the gov­ern­ment will one day order the evac­u­a­tion of places like Ma’ale Adu­mim just like it car­ried out in the Gaza Strip. And if that occurs, peo­ple own­ing homes here would lose nearly every­thing they have. (Many for­mer Gaza res­i­dents, for exam­ple, are angry at the gov­ern­ment because they are unem­ployed and have yet to receive their promised compensation.)

jewish signs

Still, nearly all of the set­tle­ments and out­posts are offi­cially reli­gious or have local codes like the sign pic­tured above that is posted at the entrance to Ma’ale Adumim.

west bakn images

The true divi­sion in the Israeli-Palestinian con­flict is over the sta­tus of the West Bank. But now the issue is not Israel proper vs. the West Bank. It is between the Israeli West Bank vs. the Pales­tin­ian one. As I stated, the major set­tle­ments near the Green Line are de facto per­ma­nent. The issue is which parts of the West Bank will go to Israel and which part will go the Pales­tini­ans in any future two-state solution.

In any pro­posal, Israel will want to keep the parts of the West Bank with major set­tle­ments — most of which are behind the con­tro­ver­sial separation-barrier. In return, most main­stream ana­lysts agree that Israel will have to offer a part of Israel proper that will equal that taken by the set­tle­ments. Crit­ics argue that Israel will offer to trade low-quality land, but this misses one point: As my pic­tures reveal, the parts of the West Bank in places like Ma’ale Adu­mim are not arable any­way — the set­tle­ment is located in the foothills of the Judean Desert, and the land on the bor­der is arid and rocky. The land’s only pos­si­ble uses are grow­ing olive trees and per­haps light graz­ing by animals.

The Pales­tini­ans, for the most part, still insist that they receive all of the West Bank. Cyn­ics argue that the Pales­tini­ans know that this will never occur, giv­ing them an excuse to keep attack­ing Israel. How­ever, the reluc­tance is under­stand­able — the Pales­tini­ans believe that they deserve all the land beyond the Green Line for his­tor­i­cal and reli­gious reasons.

Over­all, it is likely that the sta­tus quo will remain the sta­tus quo as far as any­one can pre­dict. The West Bank will con­tinue to be an inter­est­ing — and divi­sive — place.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

Supreme Court Speculations

February 3rd, 2010 · Uncategorized

Under­neath Their Robes reports that US Supreme Court Jus­tice John Paul Stevens may be near­ing retire­ment.  Lib­er­als, of course, hope he does so before Obama is out of office.  What would that change?  Noth­ing, of course.

Con­ser­v­a­tives out­num­ber lib­er­als on the Court now 5–4 (though I don’t really count Jus­tice Kennedy, who I think is more center-right than Chris­t­ian Right).  Obama can do noth­ing to change that, short of hop­ing for their untimely deaths (highly unlikely for folks who work fewer months per year than I go to school).

What does this mean?  Well, I’m no expert, but I wouldn’t be sur­prised if Cit­i­zens United isn’t the last case that sparks fury and fervor.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 2 CommentsTags:

Fun with Statistics

February 3rd, 2010 · Business, Dating, Economics, Finance, Humor, Science

lies, damn lies, and statisticsIf there is one thing that I learned in my finance classes in my M.B.A. stud­ies, it is that past per­for­mance does not guar­an­tee future results. To quote an oft-repeated mantra, there are lies, damn lies, and sta­tis­tics. Remem­ber this fact any time you see sta­tis­tics reported by anyone.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 2 CommentsTags:

Orthodox Dating

February 2nd, 2010 · Culture, Dating, Feminism, Judaism, Religion, Sex

For those who are inter­ested or curi­ous, I just read a good arti­cle on dat­ing in Ortho­dox Judaismshomer negiah and all.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 2 CommentsTags:

MBA">Value of MBA

February 2nd, 2010 · Advertising, Business, Economics, Education, Finance, Marketing, Personal

mbasHar­vard Busi­ness Review looks at age to deter­mine whether the per­for­mance of CEOs with MBAs are bet­ter than those without:

Are CEOs with MBAs actu­ally stronger lead­ers? The answer might depend on the age of the CEO.

Inspired by the rag­ing debate last year over the role of MBAs in the finan­cial cri­sis, we tried to ana­lyze whether hav­ing an MBA influ­ences over­all CEO per­for­mance. In a large-scale study of CEO per­for­mance since they took office, we found that other things equal, MBA CEOs had a slight per­for­mance edge over their non-MBA peers. In our analy­sis and rank­ing of the per­for­mance of 2,000 CEOs around the globe, CEOs who had an MBA on aver­age ranked 40 places higher than CEOs who didn’t have an MBA (a sta­tis­ti­cally sig­nif­i­cant effect).

My response is com­pli­cated, and it has noth­ing to do with age. Bear with me.

I’m almost 30. As my biog­ra­phy details, I have been at the bottom-rung of a news­pa­per as well as the boss of a pub­li­ca­tion. I have been the entry-level employee of an online-marketing firm as well as the owner and pres­i­dent of a busi­ness in the same sec­tor. In true jour­nal­is­tic fash­ion, I have seen enough pos­i­tive and neg­a­tives to form a few, objec­tive opinions.

Here is the nut­shell: An MBA is the same as a liberal-arts degree, except that it focuses on the busi­ness world. After study­ing for my MBA at two, dif­fer­ent uni­ver­si­ties on two, dif­fer­ent con­ti­nents, I have learned enough to have a solid foun­da­tion in every aspect of busi­ness from eco­nom­ics to finance to mar­ket­ing to man­age­ment to prod­uct supply-chains. Admit­tedly, I have become a jack of all busi­ness trades but a mas­ter of none.

(Now, some of you are right­fully ask­ing: So what is the point of an MBA if I majored in busi­ness in col­lege? And you would be cor­rect. If you stud­ied busi­ness for four years, ignore the MBA unless your com­pany or boss requires it down the road. The most that an MBA will teach you is inter­per­sonal skills for man­age­ment through sem­i­nars and classes — like when I learned how to use team­work to sail suc­cess­fully in Key West with my Exec­u­tive MBA class from Suf­folk Uni­ver­sity in Boston. But one should be able to learn the same lessons if he is at all cog­nizant of inter­per­sonal rela­tions in the work­place. The other thing that an MBA at a good school will pro­vide is net­work­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties through your class­mates for the future.)

Still, the ques­tion is: What is the value of an MBA? Here is my answer.

At upper-management lev­els in most large com­pa­nies, most peo­ple — hope­fully! — know what they are doing. The vice-president of sales and mar­ket­ing knows how to max­i­mize rev­enue. The vice-president of finance knows how to man­age the money through finan­cial hold­ings. The vice-president of oper­a­tions knows how to min­i­mize pro­duc­tion costs. So, what is the role of the CEO?

First and fore­most, the CEO should com­mu­ni­cate a vision — ide­ally handed down through the board of direc­tors — to upper-management. This much is obvi­ous. But what is left unsaid is the CEO’s role as an medi­a­tor between dif­fer­ent depart­ments with dif­fer­ent priorities.

Say that Com­pany X has $1 mil­lion in profit after a given quar­ter. How should the com­pany invest this money? Should the money go towards improv­ing marketing-and-sales efforts? Should it go towards finan­cial invest­ments and hold­ings? Should it go towards decreas­ing operations-costs? This is the deci­sion of the CEO, because each depart­ment is going to clamor for addi­tional resources to help its own efforts.

This is where a CEO with an MBA will come in handy. Most CEOs today, at least accord­ing to what I learned in busi­ness school, are for­mer CFOs — that is, they worry about the money. But this is a prob­lem. Depend­ing on the com­pany, the funds might be invested bet­ter else­where. The job of a CEO, in this con­text, is to ask the right ques­tions of the vice pres­i­dents and decide where it is best to allo­cate resources. And, regard­less of the age of the CEO, this is only pos­si­ble when the exec­u­tive has enough knowl­edge to ana­lyze the basic struc­tures of each depart­ment — with­out bias — and know how to act accordingly.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 2 CommentsTags:

Scientology

February 2nd, 2010 · Advertising, Blogosphere, Business, Marketing, Personal, Religion

Since we put adver­tis­ing on this blog, we have noticed some­thing strange: Many of the blocks for Google Ads have brought up adver­tise­ments for Sci­en­tol­ogy on a reg­u­lar basis. Has any­one else noticed this? (Sam, for exam­ple, has seen the same adver­tise­ments in his RSS feeds in Google Reader.)

We can only think of one of two options:

1.) Google states that it will show adver­tise­ments for non-profit orga­ni­za­tions on web­site spaces when­ever for-profit ads are unavail­able. Does Sci­en­tol­ogy, like all other reli­gious orga­ni­za­tions, qual­ify for this space? If so, then why are their ads appear­ing more often than those for hunger relief, Chris­t­ian groups, or any other organization?

2.) Sci­en­tol­ogy out­bid for-profit com­pa­nies for a monop­oly on a large num­ber of Google key­words, thereby ensur­ing that their ads appear on a reg­u­lar basis on a vari­ety of websites.

We’re curi­ous. Any­one have any thoughts?

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 4 CommentsTags:

Calvin and Hobbes

February 2nd, 2010 · Books, Culture, Entertainment, Humor, Personal, Philosophy

bill watterson

Bill Wat­ter­son, cre­ator of the “Calvin and Hobbes,” gives an inter­view fif­teen years after the famous comic-strip ended:

With almost 15 years of sep­a­ra­tion and reflec­tion, what do you think it was about “Calvin and Hobbes” that went beyond just cap­tur­ing read­ers’ atten­tion, but their hearts as well?

The only part I under­stand is what went into the cre­ation of the strip. What read­ers take away from it is up to them. Once the strip is pub­lished, read­ers bring their own expe­ri­ences to it, and the work takes on a life of its own. Every­one responds dif­fer­ently to dif­fer­ent parts.

I just tried to write hon­estly, and I tried to make this lit­tle world fun to look at, so peo­ple would take the time to read it. That was the full extent of my con­cern. You mix a bunch of ingre­di­ents, and once in a great while, chem­istry hap­pens. I can’t explain why the strip caught on the way it did, and I don’t think I could ever dupli­cate it. A lot of things have to go right all at once.

Calvin and Hobbes” is one of only two comic strips that I truly remem­ber even though it ended when I was four­teen years old. “Peanuts” and Char­lie Brown were merely tele­vi­sion spe­cials at Hal­loween and Christ­mas to me, and I under­stood only in ret­ro­spect that the main char­ac­ter was a depressed nar­cis­sist accom­pa­nied by a cast of inter­est­ing — if super­fi­cial — char­ac­ters whose actions only deep­ened Brown’s exis­ten­tial despair. “Garfield and Friends” was a funny, Saturday-morning car­toon that far sur­passed the comic strip (though, from what I heard, the film was hor­ri­ble as well). The only other strip that equaled “Calvin and Hobbes” was “The Far Side,” which used wit and dra­matic irony in a way that delighted adults but prob­a­bly went over the heads of most children.

Still, the beauty of “Calvin and Hobbes” was its rel­e­vance to peo­ple of all ages. Chil­dren, like me, could revel in Calvin’s need for fan­tasy and escapism in the guise of Space­man Spiff or his other char­ac­ters as well as his pointed dis­missals of the sometimes-illogical behav­iors of teach­ers, par­ents, and friends. More­over, Hobbes served as the epit­ome of a good role-model. The tiger was the real­is­tic, adult anchor that bal­anced Calvin’s irra­tional enthu­si­asm who also encour­aged the child’s cre­ative imag­i­na­tion. Too many adults want to destroy that impulse. More­over, Hobbes served as a loyal com­pan­ion to a per­son who, at a young age, was try­ing to fig­ure out the com­plex­ity of the adult world. In the same vein, adults could read “Calvin and Hobbes” and remem­ber how to see the world through the eyes of a sim­ple child who has not yet been cor­rupted as well as enjoy the sub­tle social-criticism that Calvin speaks (prob­a­bly with­out real­iz­ing it).

The last comic strip, pic­tured above, encap­su­lated this theme. Although it will be more mean­ing­ful to read­ers who are famil­iar with the entire strip, the mes­sage is clear: The world is a glo­ri­ous place that peo­ple should explore with amaze­ment, curios­ity, imag­i­na­tion, and won­der. When­ever adults for­get this, they begin to die inside.

In the near future, I will buy the “Calvin and Hobbes” col­lec­tion for my thirteen-year-old brother. (But don’t tell him!) No child­hood is com­plete with­out it.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 1 CommentTags:

Faked Moon-Landing

February 1st, 2010 · Civil Liberties, Culture, Entertainment, Marketing, Media, Politics, Russia, Science, War

Here is the most-bizarre post you’ll read today: Stan­ley Kubrick’s “The Shin­ing” is evi­dence that the moon-landing in 1969 was faked.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

U.S. Budget Aims to Cut Deficit

February 1st, 2010 · Uncategorized

The Wall Street Jour­nal used to actu­ally be a respectable news orga­ni­za­tion, in the old-time, aim-for-objectivity, Amer­i­can sense of the term.  Now they are part of Rupert Mur­doch’s info­tain­ment empire.  An arti­cle on Obama’s deficit shows just how far they’ve fallen in qual­ity and con­tent.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 3 CommentsTags:

Beer and Religious Sects

January 31st, 2010 · Culture, Food, Humor, Israel, Judaism, Religion, The Middle East

JERUSALEM — Just came across two inter­est­ing blog posts. Frum Satire, in his own, comedic way, intro­duces us to the other “streams” of Judaism in addi­tion to the well-known Ortho­dox, Con­ser­v­a­tive, and Reform ones. And after tast­ing a friend’s home­made beer in Israel, Food Bridge shows us how to make it ourselves.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 1 CommentTags:

Miscellanea

January 28th, 2010 · Uncategorized

Per­haps we should just have let South Car­olina secede.  At least, thanks to Jon Stew­art, their foibles are made funny.

Humans are born to run bare­foot. No!  Really?

Peo­ple have ridicu­lous expec­ta­tions of the president’s – any U.S. president’s – power to get things done.

Sex addic­tion?  Really?  Tiger Woods is being treated for it, it seems.

FYI: CO2 is not the only – or the worst – green­house gas.

Willpower is bunk?  Not sure I buy it.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 2 CommentsTags:

Radio Interview

January 26th, 2010 · Administrative, Israel, Media, Personal, The Middle East

Sam will be inter­viewed on Arutz Sheva — Israel National Radio — in just under an hour at 21:00 Israel time, 2 p.m. EST, 1 p.m. CST. Lis­ten live here.

Never mind — last-minute sched­ule change. Sam will be on the radio another week.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

Israeli Customer-Service

January 26th, 2010 · Business, Culture, Economics, Israel, Law, Personal, Politics, The Middle East

JERUSALEM — So I went to the neigh­bor­hood super­mar­ket to pur­chase a bot­tle of Coke. There were no indi­vid­ual bot­tles on the shelf — only six-packs of the them.

I asked a nearby stock­boy if there were any indi­vid­ual bot­tles left. He walked to the shelf, glanced at the bot­tles, and then pointed to a six-pack box. “Just take one from there,” he said with a shrug as he walked away. So I did — and left the opened, now-five-pack box on the shelf.

I recently wrote about the frus­tra­tions involved with the lack of customer-service in Israeli banks and tele­phone com­pa­nies. But this lat­est event made me real­ize some­thing: It is not merely, as I wrote, that Israelis are gen­er­ally cheap. It’s that they just don’t care about rules. As I wrote in a prior post in my Let­ters from Israel series, Israeli soci­ety is becom­ing increas­ing frac­tured and Israelis are becom­ing more self-centered. As a recent Jerusalem Post arti­cle notes, many — if not most — Israeli bars, pubs, and clubs openly flout the smok­ing ban that was passed a few years ago. There is lit­tle respect for the rules — or the law.

When I went to the cashier with the bot­tle of Coke, the price came to NIS 3.96. “Four shekels,” she told me. I was not sur­prised. When­ever some­one pur­chases some­thing and the price is just below or above a round num­ber, the clerk will just round it off. If it is NIS 18.97 or 19.03, he will just take nine­teen shekels. If it is under nine­teen, he will usu­ally not give change unless the cus­tomer demands it. If it is over nine­teen, he will not mind tak­ing a lit­tle loss.

The only rea­son I can sur­mise is that the clerks care so lit­tle that they don’t want to be both­ered mak­ing change for such a small amount. After all, Israelis are a blunt and quick peo­ple — they hate wast­ing time in any­thing. They seem not to care about what the man­agers or own­ers will think. It must drive their accoun­tants crazy!

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 4 CommentsTags:

Love your enemies

January 25th, 2010 · Uncategorized

A per­spec­tive from a for­mer Marine offers first-person insight on the mix­ture of reli­gion and war­fare.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

Israeli Banks, Again

January 25th, 2010 · Business, Culture, Economics, Finance, Humor, Israel, Personal, The Middle East

JERUSALEM — After I spent four hours try­ing to open a new, Israeli check­ing account after return­ing to the city, the insan­ity did not end.

On the day that I final­ized the account, the banker ordered an ATM/debit card for me. Now, in the United States, banks will give you a tem­po­rary card until the real one arrives in the mail. But that would be too log­i­cal for the Mid­dle East. When­ever you order a new debit or credit card in Israel , you need to wait five busi­ness days before it will be wait­ing at the branch for you.

So, the fol­low­ing Thurs­day, I went to the branch to get my card. After wait­ing in line — always a has­sle — the banker told me that there was a prob­lem and that all of the cards that were ordered the last week had not been processed. But, she told me with a smile, she would be happy to order another one with­out the fee! Still, it would take another five busi­ness days.

It was all I could do not to yell. Since this is Israel, per­haps I should have shouted.

Now, cor­rect me if I am wrong, but would it not make sense for the bank to do the fol­low­ing when there is a prob­lem like this:

1.) The moment the bank knows that the ordered cards will not be processed, they will reorder them on the spot to min­i­mize the addi­tional wait­ing time for the cus­tomer; and

2.) Notify the cus­tomer imme­di­ately of the prob­lem so he will not come to the branch and waste his time.

But, no, that would make too much sense. Rather, the bank waited — inten­tion­ally or not — for me to come to the branch, hear the news, and then order another card myself. I hate wast­ing time — and, more­over, I can only with­draw cash from bank tellers for now, and that costs a fee every time.

The insan­ity is bad for both me and the bank. The bank loses money by increas­ing the time until I can have the ATM/debit card because they charge a fee for each trans­ac­tion on the card. (Don’t get me started on Israeli bank fees.) The bank’s brand image in my mind becomes tar­nished. (But don’t remind be that all the major Israeli banks are viewed as col­lud­ing with each other, so there is lit­tle dif­fer­ence between them.) And, as men­tioned, I lose money by hav­ing to go to tellers for transactions.

There is more. My con­sult­ing busi­ness is usu­ally paid in dol­lars via wire trans­fers since most of my clients are in the United States right now. Last week’s check arrived on Thurs­day and was cred­ited on Fri­day. Still, my branch is closed of Fri­days — and one can­not do busi­ness in Israel at any other branch of the same bank but your spe­cific one — so I had to wait until Sun­day to receive the money. Or so I thought.

On Sun­day, I went to the branch. The banker told me that he can­not con­vert the dol­lars in my account into shekels — and I can only with­draw shekels — because the cur­rency mar­kets would not be open until Monday.

Can’t you just use Friday’s clos­ing rate?” I asked.

No.”

So, I can’t do anything?”

No, but first thing Mon­day, I’ll covert the cur­rency before the bank opens.”

At least it was something.

So, today –  four days later — I went to the teller to with­draw the money (and pay a fee, of course). I told her that a banker had already con­verted the currency.

So,” she said, “why didn’t you with­draw the money yes­ter­day?” (Israelis love to pry into each other’s lives.)

I didn’t have any strength left to argue. I smiled, took the money, and left. I know that Israel has had only had sixty years to build the gov­ern­men­tal, cul­tural, and eco­nomic foun­da­tions for a coun­try built on sand, but it is too much to ask for some­one to insert some logic into this place?

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ 12 CommentsTags:

Book Review: 1948 — The First Arab-Israeli War

January 24th, 2010 · Anti-Semitism, Book Reviews, Books, Britain, Christianity, Civil Liberties, Egypt, Europe, Iraq, Islam, Israel, Judaism, Personal, Politics, Religion, The Middle East, War

benny morrisJERUSALEM — Benny Mor­ris, a pro­fes­sor of his­tory in the Middle-East Stud­ies Depart­ment at Ben-Gurion Uni­ver­sity, is some­thing of an enigma. Him­self born in Israel in 1948, the year of the re-founding of the coun­try and the result­ing war with neigh­bor­ing Arab states, Mor­ris is the lead­ing fig­ure in the so-called “New His­to­rian” move­ment in Israel that has been turn­ing the mytholo­gies of the left and right on their polit­i­cal heads. Once a dar­ling of the left­ist camp, Mor­ris’ recent works are now largely embraced by the right wing.

The professor’s books are so long — and full of sourced detail — that it is easy for peo­ple on any side to cherry-pick a detail or anec­dote to prove a point. But the larger pic­ture shows that the truth, as usual, is more com­plex than the left or right would like to admit.

In “1948: The First Arab-Israeli War,” Mor­ris uses newly-available mate­r­ial from Israeli and West­ern gov­ern­ments to present almost a day-by-day account of the polit­i­cal nego­ti­a­tions and the Jewish-Arab civil war that occurred before Israel’s dec­la­ra­tion of inde­pen­dence as well as the result­ing inva­sion of Israel by many of the sur­round­ing Arab coun­tries and their even­tual defeat. (Much of the Arab archives were still secret and unavailable.)

In 420 pages, the reader can see how Middle-Eastern pol­i­tics often works: future Prime Min­is­ter Golda Meir trav­el­ing to Jor­dan dis­guised in Arab robes to try to per­suade the country’s king not to invade Israel; both the Jew­ish and Arab forces try­ing to get the British to help them before leav­ing Pales­tine; the clan­des­tine efforts of busi­ness­men in the United States and Europe to get weapons to the Jew­ish army despite a U.S. embargo; and Arab lead­ers fac­ing enor­mous pub­lic pres­sure to invade despite their doubts of defeat­ing Israel.

There is some­thing in this book — which is des­tined to be the defin­i­tive work on the 1948 bat­tles for the indef­i­nite future — that will inter­est and out­rage peo­ple of all polit­i­cal view­points and ide­olo­gies. My point here is to pro­vide exam­ples that may shat­ter the pre­con­ceived notions of the left and right.

For the left: The region of Pales­tine was never con­sid­ered a “dis­tinct and sep­a­rate province” by any of his Mus­lim rulers (except briefly by Sal­adin, who defeated the Cru­saders). It was merely part of a greater sec­tion that was admin­is­tered from Dam­as­cus, which would even­tu­ally become the cap­i­tal of Syria:

[Arabs in Pales­tine] iden­ti­fied them­selves them­selves simul­ta­ne­ously as sub­jects of the (multi­na­tional) Ottoman Empire and as part of the (multi­na­tional) com­mu­nity of Islam; as Arabs, in terms of geog­ra­phy, cul­ture, and lan­guage; as inhab­i­tants of this or that region and vil­lage of a vaguely-defined Pales­tine; and as mem­bers of this or that clan or fam­ily. There was… not even a hint, in 1881, of a sep­a­rate Pales­tin­ian Arab nationalism.”

There was no such thing as a “Pales­tin­ian peo­ple” until much, much later.

For the right: The early Zion­ists bought as much land as pos­si­ble quarter-acre by quarter-acre from the Ottoman Empire or absen­tee, Arab land­lords — but they never told any­one that their inten­tion was to cre­ate a Jew­ish state. As one set­tler wrote in regards to the res­i­dent Arabs:

we shall… take away the coun­try… through strat­a­gems [pur­chas­ing], with­out draw­ing upon us their hos­til­ity before we become the strong and pop­u­lous ones.”

There was never a “land with­out a peo­ple” for a “peo­ple with­out a land,” to quote part of the mythol­ogy of Zionism.

For the left: In the first Jewish-Arab civil war that pre­ceded the 1948 pan-Arab inva­sion, “most [Arabs res­i­dents of Pales­tine who fled parts of what would become Jew­ish ter­ri­tory] were pro­pelled by fear of being caught up, and harmed, in the fight­ing; some may have feared life under Jew­ish rule… the chang­ing eco­nomic con­di­tions [for the worse] also con­tributed.” The Jew­ish forces did not forcibly expel the Arab pop­u­la­tion. The Arab lead­ers tried, usu­ally in vain, to con­vince Arab males to stay and fight — but many Arabs left voluntarily.

In the lat­ter stage of the civil war, the Jew­ish mil­i­tary imple­mented the con­tro­ver­sial “Plan D”:

The plan gave [indi­vid­ual] brigades carte blanche to con­quer the Arab vil­lages and, in effect, to decide on each village’s fate — destruc­tion or expul­sion or occu­pa­tion… Nowhere does the doc­u­ment speak of a pol­icy or desire to expel “the Arab inhab­i­tants” of Pales­tine or of any of its con­stituent regions; nowhere is any brigade instructed to clear out “the Arabs.”

It was never the pol­icy of the Jew­ish — and, later, Israeli — gov­ern­ments to force the neigh­bor­ing Arabs out of the soon-to-be-borne state. In actu­al­ity, the gov­ern­ment hopes that all peo­ples could live together — as was stated in the State of Israel’s Dec­la­ra­tion of Inde­pen­dence and often quoted by Israeli officials.

For the right: The sur­round­ing, Arab coun­tries were not super­power behe­moths bent on destroy­ing the tiny, Jew­ish state and killing all the Jews; in real­ity, many lead­ers expressed doubts about invad­ing — and they were led to invade in the end by their reli­gious lead­ers and the Arab “street,” which wanted to fight in sup­port of their Arab broth­ers. For exam­ple, the king of Jor­dan only wanted to invade and secure East Jerusalem and the West Bank to enrich his own king­dom; he did not want to risk antag­o­niz­ing the West by attack­ing the Jew­ish part of Pales­tine. In response, Egypt wanted to expand its lands east and north to bal­ance what the coun­try pre­sumed would be Jordan’s increased ter­ri­tory. The 1948 war was just as much — if not more — about ter­ri­tory than mas­sacring the Jews. Pri­vate inten­tions and pub­lic state­ments to not always match.

Some of the things I learned while read­ing this book:

  • Some Israeli offi­cers were U.S. vet­er­ans of World War II.
  • Some Jor­dan­ian offi­cers were British vet­er­ans of World War II.
  • Britain sup­ported the Jew­ish set­tlers because the Arab pop­u­la­tion sided with the Ottoman Empire dur­ing World War I; Britain toned down the sup­port dur­ing World War II to pacify the Arabs and allow the coun­try to use Pales­tine as a base of oper­a­tions against Italy. This led to deep, Jew­ish dis­trust of the British. Still, most Arabs in Pales­tine wanted the Axis pow­ers to win.
  • Dur­ing the British Man­date, Britain trained and equipped the Jew­ish set­tlers, many of whom fought in World War II. A few years later, the set­tlers used the knowl­edge against the Arabs and, in some cases, to attack the British.
  • Pres­i­dent Franklin Roo­sevelt would not offi­cially sup­port the Jew­ish set­tlers because he wanted friend­ship — and oil — from the king of Saudi Ara­bia. Later, Jew­ish lob­by­ing efforts — as well as an Amer­i­can peo­ple who were just learn­ing about the Holo­caust — per­suaded Pres­i­dent Tru­man to rec­og­nize the State of Israel.
  • At the famous Yalta con­fer­ence dur­ing World War II, both Roo­sevelt and Joseph Stalin told each other that they were Zionists.
  • In 1940, a fringe group of Jew­ish fight­ers tried to enlist Nazi Germany’s aid against the British in Pales­tine; Ger­many declined.
  • Jew­ish forces likely com­mit­ted more wartime atroc­i­ties against Arabs than vice-versa.
  • Jerusalem was war-torn as a result of Jewish-Arab fight­ing as well as fight­ing between Chris­t­ian and Mus­lim Arabs.
  • The Arab armies usu­ally had more-advanced weaponry, but the Israeli mil­i­tary had more man­power as well as greater command-and-control in their own territory.

These are just a few of my notes from this dense, intrigu­ing book. I would go fur­ther, but I would just invite you to read for your­self. This is one of the best books on Mid­dle East his­tory I have read.

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

→ No CommentsTags:

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes