understanding politics, considerations

Why is There Israel Hate? Europe-Israel Relations, Israel Tourism Hurt


March 8th, 2007 · Europe, Great Britain and Ireland, Islam, Israel and the Middle East, Judaism, Religion, World Affairs

Accord­ing to a British Broad­cast­ing Cor­po­ra­tion sur­vey that was reported yesterday:

Israel, Iran and the United States are the coun­tries with the most neg­a­tive image in a globe-spanning sur­vey of atti­tudes toward 12 major coun­tries. Canada and Japan came out best in the poll, released Tuesday…

Israel was viewed neg­a­tively by 56 per cent of respon­dents and pos­i­tively by 17 per cent; for Iran, the fig­ures were 54 per cent and 18 per cent. The United States had the third-highest neg­a­tive rank­ing, with 51 per cent cit­ing it as a bad influ­ence and 30 per cent as a good one. Next was North Korea, which was viewed neg­a­tively by 48 per cent and pos­i­tively by 19 per cent.

Another recent sur­vey reports that Amer­i­cans are increas­ingly sym­pa­thetic to Israel, so this is a phe­nom­e­non that exists pri­mar­ily in Europe and else­where. Some­thing is ter­ri­bly wrong when Israel is viewed more neg­a­tively than Iran, a coun­try whose gov­ern­ment oppresses women, restricts civil lib­er­ties and threat­ens to exter­mi­nate neigh­bor­ing coun­tries. But what could the rea­son be?

One pos­si­ble answer – usu­ally sug­gested by Jews who are polit­i­cally or the­o­log­i­cally con­ser­v­a­tive — is sim­ple anti-Semitism. But I doubt this is the case. Despite a recent uptick in anti-Semitic inci­dents, there has not been a wide­spread, orga­nized resur­gence of anti-Semitism or fas­cism. If those who insist that the entire world “hates the Jews” were cor­rect, then there would be sim­i­lar views of Israel through­out the world. But this seems to be specif­i­cally a Euro­pean tendency.

So, why Europe? A Jerusalem Post edi­to­r­ial sug­gests an answer:

Per­haps the best expla­na­tion, then, is one given by Stephan Vopel of the Ger­man Ber­tels­mann Foun­da­tion for why many more Amer­i­cans and Israelis favor a mil­i­tary strike against Iran than Ger­mans: “While Israelis sub­scribe to the maxim ‘never again,’ the Ger­man dic­tum is ‘never again war.’” Paci­fism, in other words, is the dri­ving force behind Euro­pean ani­mus toward both the US and Israel.

Euro­peans real­ize that Iran is a threat, but they are almost as, if not more, opposed to con­fronting that threat than they are fear­ful of the threat itself.

The US and Israel, as the nations that are per­ceived both as Iran’s main tar­gets and as those most actively fight­ing back, are threats to the Euro­pean strat­egy of lying low and hop­ing that their adver­sary will go away.

Fol­low­ing cen­turies of war — par­tic­u­larly the bru­tal­ity of the twen­ti­eth cen­tury — Euro­peans are, under­stand­ably, tired of con­flict. The con­ti­nent seems to have adopted the phi­los­o­phy of “peace at all costs.” They are paci­fied and paci­fist. To Europe, any and all war is bad.

The harsh truth, how­ever, is that some­times war is the answer (but only in defen­sive con­texts). Some­times one must kill those who want to kill him because no other option exists. Euro­peans, and paci­fists in gen­eral, do not accept this fact. To them, any coun­try that engages in war, no mat­ter the con­text, is bad – and Israel, from time to time, must go to war to defend itself. To Euro­peans, this is unac­cept­able. This men­tal­ity is another rea­son that the con­ti­nent has been slow to respond to the grow­ing threat of extrem­ist Islam within its borders.

Another pos­si­ble rea­son for Europe’s neg­a­tive view of Israel is the fact that a state based on a sin­gle eth­nic­ity and reli­gion is now polit­i­cally incor­rect in a cli­mate that cel­e­brates “mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism.” Still, most states have indeed been cre­ated through the uni­fi­ca­tion of peo­ples with a com­mon eth­nic­ity. (The United States is the sig­nif­i­cant excep­tion.) The Franks became France. A loose col­lec­tion of Ger­manic states became Ger­many. Var­i­ous prin­ci­pal­i­ties and city-states became the Italy we know today.

There’s noth­ing inher­ently wrong with states based on eth­nic­ity. (In fact, the exis­tence of African coun­tries — cre­ated by Euro­pean colo­nial pow­ers – com­prised of com­pet­ing tribes and peo­ples is a pri­mary rea­son for the civil wars that are wag­ing through­out the con­ti­nent.) The only excep­tion is when exist­ing states try to “purify” them­selves of other peo­ples. We all know what hap­pens when coun­tries try to do that: Ger­many, Bosnia, Rwanda, the Arme­ni­ans and Darfur.

Tags: