understanding politics, considerations

Social Politics and the Causes of 9/11


June 5th, 2007 · Religion, World Affairs

social politics, causes of 9/11I recently watched “The Road to 9/11,” a one-hour PBS doc­u­men­tary that suc­cinctly presents the his­tory of the mod­ern Mid­dle East from 1918 to the present day in terms of social pol­i­tics and global his­tory. I highly rec­om­mend it to any­one who wants to under­stand the com­plex region with­out need­ing a pol­i­tics degree or pol­i­tics courses.

With apolo­gies to the pro­duc­ers of the film, I’ll sum­ma­rize the film here.

Sep­tem­ber 11 Essay: The Causes of 9/11

The Ottoman Empire, an Islamic power for roughly 1,300 years, controlled most of the Mid­dle East until 1918. In World War I, it joined the Cen­tral Pow­ers — the even­tual losers. Fol­low­ing their vic­tory, the Allies dis­mem­bered the empire, deposed the sul­tan, occu­pied the cap­i­tal, cre­ated new provinces, and chose pro-Western lead­ers to rule them. Many of these new provinces were com­prised of com­pet­ing Sunni and Shi’a Mus­lims, as well as com­pet­ing tribes and eth­nic groups, because the Euro­pean colo­nial strat­egy at the time was to divide — and then con­quer – peo­ples. (These divi­sions would become increas­ingly important.)

Soon, peo­ple began riot­ing for inde­pen­dence. The first coun­try to become inde­pen­dent was Turkey. In 1919, Mustafa Ataturk, who led the insur­rec­tion, wanted to mod­ern­ize Turkey and bring it into the twen­ti­eth cen­tury by abol­ish­ing the Caliphate, mak­ing the coun­try offi­cially sec­u­lar and ensur­ing that women were equal. Ataturk was suc­cess­ful. It is hard to over­state the sig­nif­i­cance of these reforms to many reli­gious Mus­lims. They believed that Islam was not “whole” with­out a Caliphate, and they were angry that Turkey’s growth was a result of hereti­cal notions and “for­eign ideas” imported from the West. These Mus­lims despise Ataturk and every­thing he represented.

In the 1920s, the House of Saud was con­sol­i­dat­ing its con­trol over what would become Saudi Ara­bia. To secure its con­trol, the royal fam­ily formed an alliance with rad­i­cal Islamic cler­ics who were opposed to mod­ern­iza­tion and lib­eral Mus­lim thought. These cler­ics were allowed to do what­ever they wished as long as they sup­ported the gov­ern­ment. In Egypt, a new group named the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood was formed in response to the view that Mus­lims would lose their faith and her­itage if they embraced “West­ern­iza­tion” and fem­i­nism. The Mus­lim Broth­er­hood wanted to restore the Caliphate and gen­er­ally had two wings who sup­ported dif­fer­ent strate­gies: one was ded­i­cated to per­form­ing char­ity and good works, and the other focused on dras­tic, vio­lent means. The Broth­er­hood would be the inspi­ra­tion for sim­i­lar groups — like al-Qaeda — in other countries.

In the 1930s, Arab lead­ers allied them­selves with the Nazis in Ger­many because, as the Arab say­ing goes, “the enemy of my enemy of my friend.” After all, the Nazis were fight­ing the Allied coun­tries who had col­o­nized the Mid­dle East and, in their view, brought for­eign and hereti­cal ideas. Anti-Semitism had actu­ally been rare in the Mid­dle East until the Nazis began spread­ing their pro­pa­ganda in Arab countries.

Fol­low­ing the dev­as­ta­tion of World War II, Great Britain was unable to keep its colonies in the Mid­dle East. So inde­pen­dent states were formed — includ­ing Israel in 1948. To Arab coun­tries, the exis­tence was Israel was yet another exten­sion of colo­nial Europe — even though the Arabs rejected a plan that would have cre­ated another inde­pen­dent state for the Arab peo­ple known as Pales­tini­ans along­side Israel. Imme­di­ately after Israel declared its inde­pen­dence, the Arab coun­tries declared war — and lost. This defeat was viewed as an utter humil­i­a­tion because five whole coun­tries could not defeat 500,000 Jews. Soon after the war, most of the lead­ers of Arab coun­tries were deposed or killed.

In the 1950s, a new gen­er­a­tion of lead­ers arose in much of the Arab world who built author­i­tar­ian, repres­sive gov­ern­ments that were founded on ani­mos­ity towards Israel. In Egypt, Pres­i­dent Nasser wanted to unify the Arab world under an anti-Western, social­ist platform. Nasser allied him­self with the Soviet Union, which wanted to increase its influ­ence among Arab coun­tries as a way to gain addi­tional sup­port against the United States. The United States began to sup­port Israel as a coun­ter­weight. (The Cold War was a global chess game.) Nasser mar­gin­al­ized the oppo­si­tion Mus­lim Broth­er­hood, and he jailed or exe­cuted the group’s lead­ers. How­ever, the group grew on the street — not in the least due to sup­port from the United States.

Nasser’s social­ist poli­cies failed mis­er­ably, plung­ing the coun­try into eco­nomic chaos. To raise his sup­port and deflect crit­i­cism, Nasser was about to lead sev­eral Arab coun­tries into the Six-Day War against Israel in 1967. The Jew­ish State, how­ever, pre-emptively attacked and won. This was yet another humil­i­a­tion for the Arab and Mus­lim world. (Fun­da­men­tal­ists blamed it on the fact that Mus­lims had turned away from Islam.) Fol­low­ing this defeat, some of the most repres­sive dic­ta­tor­ships arose in the Mid­dle East.

In the 1970s, oil began to affect the geo-political sit­u­a­tion. Coun­tries that became rich from oil rev­enue, like Saudi Arabia, had lit­tle moti­va­tion to cre­ate a func­tion­ing, free-market econ­omy. These author­i­tar­ian gov­ern­ments used the prof­its to sti­fle dis­sent and cement rela­tion­ships with rad­i­cal cler­ics, who were allowed to preach what­ever they wanted. Soon, the new, rad­i­cal phi­los­o­phy of Wah­habism — which advo­cated for a “jihad” against every­thing mod­ern — arose, and it would even­tu­ally inspire peo­ple like Osama bin Laden and the future lead­ers of Hamas and Hizbol­lah. The Saudi Ara­bian gov­ern­ment funded Islamic mosques and schools around the world only if they would preach the views of these cler­ics, who rein­ter­preted Islamic law to per­mit sui­cide even though tra­di­tional teach­ings had deemed it a “mor­tal sin.”

Arti­cle Pages: 1 2