understanding politics, considerations

College Loans and the Burden of University


February 25th, 2008 · Business, Economics, and Finance

college loansBrown Uni­ver­sity has the right idea regard­ing col­lege loans:

Brown Uni­ver­sity is elim­i­nat­ing tuition for stu­dents whose par­ents earn less than $60,000, after deci­sions by fel­low Ivy League uni­ver­si­ties to bol­ster finan­cial aid as their endow­ments grow.

The uni­ver­sity, in Prov­i­dence, R.I., said on Sat­ur­day that it also planned to sub­sti­tute grants for stu­dent loans in the finan­cial aid pack­ages of stu­dents whose fam­i­lies earned less than $100,000 a year. The new pro­gram cuts reliance on loans for all stu­dents regard­less of fam­ily income, the uni­ver­sity said in a state­ment posted on its Web site.

When I attended Boston Uni­ver­sity to study jour­nal­ism, the school’s chan­cel­lor, John Sil­ber, once said that he intended to run the place like a busi­ness. Most of the stu­dents and fac­ulty were under­stand­ably upset because uni­ver­si­ties, of course, are not busi­nesses. Their sole pur­pose is not to make money; it is to edu­cate tomorrow’s lead­ers. Uni­ver­si­ties pro­mote the pub­lic good and should be regarded as non-profit organizations.

This is why the sky­rock­et­ing cost of higher edu­ca­tion — BU now costs close to $50,000 per year — is such a bur­den. (For more detail on the harm that higher-education and student-loan expenses are doing to today’s stu­dents, I highly rec­om­mend “Gen­er­a­tion Debt” by Anya Kamenetz.) Most uni­ver­si­ties have extremely large endow­ments, and they do not need to charge ever-increasing tuition rates while replac­ing grants with loans.

Uni­ver­si­ties, how­ever, can do what­ever they wish because for all intents and pur­poses, they are monop­o­lies. Every­one is told — falsely, I might add – that they must go to col­lege to have a good life, and this leads to exces­sive demand for a lim­ited sup­ply of spaces in class­rooms and dor­mi­to­ries. As a result of the law of sup­ply and demand, the price increases.

Few col­leges, I expect, will emu­late Brown. So it is up to stu­dents and par­ents to get the free mar­ket to work in their favor. High-school stu­dents need to be told that not every­one needs to attend col­lege. Not every­one even wants to do so. As I wrote in a prior post, the world needs sci­en­tists and plumbers – and peo­ple in both pro­fes­sions can earn a very good liv­ing. (Plumbers also have job secu­rity — they can never be out­sourced!) The neg­a­tive stigma that Amer­i­can soci­ety attaches to blue-collar jobs needs to be erased.

I also encour­age Amer­i­can high-school stu­dents to get their under­grad­u­ate degrees from uni­ver­si­ties in for­eign coun­tries — not only is it cheaper to study the same mate­r­ial, they will also learn about other lan­guages and cul­tures. As a result, they will be bet­ter pre­pared to com­pete in a glob­al­ized world as well.

When the demand for Amer­i­can higher edu­ca­tion declines, so will the price.