understanding politics, considerations

Marketing Schools: Firms Marketing Sex to Children?


May 21st, 2008 · Business, Economics, and Finance, Marketing and Advertising, World Affairs

marketing schoolsRISHON LEZION, Israel — After learn­ing that cloth­ing com­pa­nies are now sell­ing padded bras designed for six-year-old girls, Katharine Mieszkowski inter­views M. Gigi Durham, the author of the new book “The Lolita Effect.” (I won­der what meth­ods mar­ket­ing schools are now teach­ing stu­dents.) This com­ment is very insightful:

In the mid-‘90s there was a lot of dis­pos­able income float­ing around and tweens became a very impor­tant niche mar­ket for a num­ber of indus­tries. One research firm Euromon­i­tor posits tweens spend­ing $170 bil­lion in 2006. So, this is a wealthy lit­tle group of people.

Mar­keters real­ized they could cre­ate cradle-to-grave con­sumers by mar­ket­ing prod­ucts to kids very early. Then, they would develop brand loy­al­ties, and con­sumer prac­tices that they would sus­tain through­out their life­times. It was very prof­itable to start mar­ket­ing these prod­ucts to very young kids.

Also, as women have made tremen­dous gains polit­i­cally and in the work­force, grown women are mov­ing away from this tra­di­tional model of fem­i­nin­ity where women are sup­posed to be docile and pas­sive. And lit­tle girls still con­form to that very tra­di­tional ideal of fem­i­nin­ity. So I think that increas­ing atten­tion is being focused on lit­tle girls as embody­ing ideal femininity…

Mar­ket­ing to chil­dren is noth­ing new, of course. That was one of the main rea­sons that McDonald’s became so suc­cess­ful: restau­rants with play­grounds, Happy Meals, and Ronald McDon­ald all instilled a love of the brand in chil­dren, who would then become devoted con­sumers for life. (Read this for more back­ground.) Per­son­ally, I’ve always thought that Burger King’s ham­burg­ers tasted bet­ter, anyway.

How­ever, peo­ple with a mar­ket­ing degree using sex­ual themes to mar­ket to chil­dren is fairly new, and so is sell­ing prod­ucts whose themes are overtly sex­ual — even in e-mail mar­ket­ing ser­vices, bulk e-mail mar­ket­ing, and e-mail mar­ket­ing solu­tions. What happened?

It’s a sim­ple exam­ple of the slip­pery slope: As overt and explicit sex­u­al­ity became more mainstream, more and things became viewed as accept­able. A gen­er­a­tion of girls raised in such an envi­ron­ment pro­duces only Girls Gone Wild! (warn­ing: explicit), in which col­lege girls strip in front of cameras, as well as par­ents who buy thongs for chil­dren. (By the way, read this pro­file of Girls Gone Wild! founder Joe Fran­cis. It will make you cringe.)

I hope — and pre­dict — that these atti­tudes towards sex are the extreme end of a pen­du­lum shift, and soon it will begin mov­ing towards the oppo­site end in any e-mail mar­ket­ing cam­paign, mar­ket­ing automa­tion, and Internet-marketing training.

Each gen­er­a­tion typ­i­cally rebels against the prior one. While Puri­tan­i­cal atti­tudes towards sex are harm­ful, so is extreme licen­tious­ness. When I lived in Jerusalem, I saw the ben­e­fit of liv­ing in a cul­ture that places a great impor­tance on mod­esty. While this atti­tude can be taken to an extreme, I think it is gen­er­ally health­ier for peo­ple and bet­ter for society.

Adden­dum: The com­pet­ing desires within women to express their sex­u­al­ity but not be viewed as a slut is one of the rea­sons that the mod­ern dat­ing scene in Amer­ica is so dif­fi­cult. My prior essay is here.