understanding politics, considerations

Politics Before Religion


October 2nd, 2008 · Christianity, Religion, World Affairs

Sarah Palin is caus­ing some South­ern Bap­tist Chris­tians to be just a lit­tle hyp­o­crit­i­cal:

Within the nation’s largest Protes­tant denom­i­na­tion, a woman may not lead a church or a home. But promi­nent South­ern Bap­tists see noth­ing wrong with Sarah Palin serv­ing as vice pres­i­dent — or per­haps even commander-in-chief someday.

In other words: A woman can run the White House, just not her own house.

Here are one rel­e­vant pas­sage from the Chris­t­ian Bible (it is included in the arti­cle itself): “But I do not allow a woman to teach or exer­cise author­ity over a man, but to remain quiet” (1 Tim­o­thy 2:12). (Empha­sis added.)

As Dick Cheney’s tenure has shown, the Office of the Vice Pres­i­dent is one that can have a lot of author­ity. The vice pres­i­dent also has a large staff that, in the end, reports directly to him. Unless Palin would hire a staff com­prised entirely of women and inter­act only with females serv­ing in the fed­eral gov­ern­ment, she would be a woman exer­cis­ing author­ity over a man.

South­ern Bap­tist Chris­tians, of course, are bib­li­cal lit­er­al­ists and fun­da­men­tal­ists, so this would be some­thing they could not endorse. But for the last twenty years, the reli­gious right and polit­i­cal right in the United States have become two sides of the same coin. They always need to be on the same page. If the South­ern Bap­tists would state that a woman serv­ing as vice pres­i­dent would be a vio­la­tion of a bib­li­cal com­mand­ment, then that could poten­tially cost John McCain mil­lions of votes.

In a world in which pol­i­tics and reli­gion are fused together, polit­i­cal real­i­ties usu­ally take prece­dence over purity of belief. And there is a word for that: hypocrisy.