understanding politics, considerations

Obama in Egypt


May 12th, 2009 · Egypt, Iran, Islam, Israel and the Middle East, Religion, World Affairs

Some­times the selec­tion of a speech’s venue is just as impor­tant as the speech’s mes­sage:

Pres­i­dent Obama’s deci­sion to deliver a speech here next month has given sig­nif­i­cant encour­age­ment to a once pow­er­ful ally that has grown increas­ingly frus­trated over its wan­ing regional influ­ence and its inabil­ity to explain to its cit­i­zens why it remains com­mit­ted to a Mid­dle East peace process that has failed to pro­duce a bet­ter life for Pales­tini­ans.

After eight years in which Egypt felt unap­pre­ci­ated and bul­lied by the Bush admin­is­tra­tion, Egypt­ian offi­cials were glee­ful about Cairo’s selec­tion last week for the president’s address to the Mus­lim world. They said that it proved Egypt remained the cap­i­tal of the Arab world and that it eased con­cerns that Wash­ing­ton might under­mine its Arab allies in exchange for a grand deal with their rivals in Iran.

The Obama admin­is­tra­tion could have selected any num­ber of Arab coun­tries to make a major speech to the Mus­lim world — most notably, the mod­er­ate states of Egypt, Jor­dan, and Saudi Ara­bia. Egypt is at a cold peace with Israel, and the coun­try receives a gen­er­ous amount of U.S. assis­tance (pos­si­bly in exchange for the peace with the Jew­ish state).

How­ever, Egypt­ian is an author­i­tar­ian regime that cracks down on dis­si­dents and also keeps Pales­tini­ans impris­oned in Gaza. Jor­dan is friendly with Israel, but it wants noth­ing to do, jus­ti­fi­ably or not, with the Pales­tini­ans in the West Bank. Saudi Ara­bia has had a his­toric friend­ship with the United States (mainly because of its vast sup­ply of oil), but the coun­try funds extrem­ist Islam schools through­out the world as a result of a devil’s bar­gain for rel­a­tive peace between the gov­ern­ment and the rad­i­cal imans there.

So, why did Pres­i­dent Obama choose Egypt? The likely rea­son is that he wants to sup­port the Arab coun­try that is the strongest bul­wark against the increas­ing influ­ence of Iran. (Do not for­get that mod­er­ate, Mus­lim coun­tries despise the theo­cratic state just as much as Israel and the United States.) Egypt­ian Pres­i­dent Hosni Mubarak has effec­tively, though unde­mo­c­ra­t­i­cally, kept the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood in check. Jordan’s gov­er­ment is weaker and fac­ing con­stant threats since a major­ity of its pop­u­la­tion is com­prised of Pales­tini­ans, many of whom are extrem­ists. Saudi Ara­bia, even if it wanted, can­not fight strongly against the Islamists in there.

Obama is prov­ing to be more prag­matic and real­is­tic than both his sup­port­ers and detrac­tors prob­a­bly thought. Although the White House is now mov­ing quickly in its efforts — rightly or not — to final­ize a two-state solu­tion between Israel and the Pales­tini­ans, it knows that its must gar­ner as much sup­port against Iran as pos­si­ble. Egypt is prob­a­bly the strongest ally in that capacity.