understanding politics, considerations

Michael Jackson


July 19th, 2009 · Culture and Entertainment, World Affairs

The death of the King of Pop has pro­vided fod­der for a lot of social com­men­tary. Come­dian Bill Mahar (see below at 1:45) says the pub­lic has always been fas­ci­nated by the artist because “Michael Jack­son is Amer­ica.” Maher says that Jack­son, like the United States, was “frag­ile, over-indulgent, child­ish, in debt, on drugs, and over the hill.”

The ever-excellent Spen­gler writes that:

The public’s grief was unfeigned and pro­found, for Jack­son embod­ied the desire of a gen­er­a­tion, that is, never to grow up…

The eter­nal ado­les­cence that Michael Jack­son so ably rep­re­sented in fan­tasy turned into the foun­da­tion for the great invest­ing wave of the 1990s. The best minds Amer­ica could train worked hundred-hour-weeks in pizza-box-strewn lofts to launch the next site for web-based greet­ing cards or virtual-reality sex. Stock ana­lysts val­ued new issues in pro­por­tion to their “burn rate”, assum­ing that the more money they lost, the more they were worth. The sort of things the world really needed — hardier seeds, safer nuclear energy, more effi­cient elec­tri­cal bat­ter­ies — never turned up on the radar screen…

The Peter Pan syn­drome con­tin­ued to afflict the Amer­i­can econ­omy. Rather than save, as aging peo­ple should, they bor­rowed more to acquire big­ger houses. The hous­ing bub­ble pro­longed America’s col­lec­tive ado­les­cence for a few more years, for it allowed Amer­i­cans to spend money on toys rather than sav­ing for the retire­ment that came rush­ing at the baby boomers like an oncom­ing express train.

Since I was born in 1980, I missed most of the enthu­si­asm over Michael Jack­son when he had been record­ing his best music. My first mem­ory was watch­ing the live, first air­ing of the 1991 video for “Black or White” — until my mother shut off the tele­vi­sion when Jack­son began destroy­ing cars with a crow­bar for no appar­ent rea­son. (I think that end­ing of the video was even­tu­ally cut.)

As a result, I was not as dis­traught as some of my friends over Jackson’s death. I don’t remem­ber any of his music after “Black or White” — all I remem­ber hear­ing at the time were his increas­ingly bizarre antics, the alle­ga­tions of child abuse, and the body-modification surg­eries. But even I had learned to appre­ci­ate his musi­cal genius even though it was well after the fact.

Although Mahar and Spengler’s argu­ments have some merit, I think the main rea­son for the emo­tional responses to Jackson’s death resulted mainly from the fact that even the Amer­i­can pub­lic — long known to cel­e­brate vapid, pop music — knew that a leg­end had passed with­out ever hav­ing the chance to redeem him­self spir­i­tu­ally, musi­cally, and psy­cho­log­i­cally. The early pass­ing of the King of Pop was a tragedy on many lev­els. Brit­ney Spears’ “Baby One More Time” may grace a com­pi­la­tion record of the great­est pop hits of the 1990s some­day, but Jack­son will be remem­bered in thirty years like the Bea­t­les are today.

Peo­ple who barely pay atten­tioned to the mean­ings in many of Jackson’s most-popular songs could be for­given because they were usu­ally clouded by amaz­ing dance movies, falsetto singing, and upbeat tem­pos. But to truly under­stand the genius behind a hit like “Bil­lie Jean,” lis­ten to the emo­tional cover by Chris Cor­nell below. It is rare that a cover sur­passes the original.