Considerations

Politics, business, religion, and culture by Samuel J. Scott and Jeff Guevin

Considerations header image 2

Paternity Tests

November 20th, 2009 · No Comments · Civil Liberties, Conservative Pundits, Culture, Dating, Economics, Feminism, Law, Politics, Sex, Technology

  • Google Buzz
  • Stumbleupon

The New York Times Mag­a­zine reports on how pater­nity test­ing is chang­ing father­hood in the United States. The fea­ture arti­cle, of course, leads with a poignant story:

For four years, Mike had known that the girl he had rocked to sleep and danced with across the living-room floor was not, as they say, “his.” The rev­e­la­tion from a DNA test was dev­as­tat­ing and prompted him to leave his wife — but he had not renounced their child. He con­tin­ued to feel that in all the ways that mat­tered, she was still his daugh­ter, and he faith­fully paid her child sup­port. It was only when he learned that his ex-wife was about to marry the man who she said actu­ally was the girl’s bio­log­i­cal father that Mike flipped. Sup­port­ing another man’s child sud­denly became unbearable.

Two years after fil­ing the suit that sought to end his pater­nal rights, Mike is still irate about the fix he’s in. “I pay child sup­port to a bio­log­i­cally intact fam­ily,” Mike told me, his voice crack­ing with incredulity. “A father and mother, mar­ried, who live with their own child. And I pay sup­port for that child. How ridicu­lous is that?”…

Mike’s conun­drum is increas­ingly play­ing out in courts across the coun­try, a result of polit­i­cal, social and tech­no­log­i­cal shifts. Stricter fed­eral rules have pressed states to chase down fathers and hold them respon­si­ble for chil­dren born out­side of mar­riage, a cat­e­gory that includes 40 per­cent of all births. At the same time, DNA tests have become eas­ier, cheaper and more reli­able. Swip­ing a few cheek cells and pay­ing a cou­ple hun­dred dol­lars can answer the ques­tion that has plagued men since the dawn of time: Am I really the father?

This issue has indeed puz­zled human­ity for thou­sands of years. As Aris­to­tle report­edly put it (I can­not find the pri­mary source):

Moth­ers are fonder than fathers of their chil­dren because they are more cer­tain they are their own.

Still, is there some­thing hap­pen­ing today that caused the Times to deem this news­wor­thy? Per­haps there is. As state gov­ern­ments right­fully clamp down on dead­beat dads — of which my late father was one — more and more men want to know for sure whether they are indeed respon­si­ble for their child’s upbringing:

Over the last decade, the num­ber of pater­nity tests taken every year jumped 64 per­cent, to more than 400,000. That fig­ure counts only a sub­set of tests — those that are admis­si­ble in court and thus require an unbi­ased tester and a doc­u­mented chain of pos­ses­sion from test site to lab. Other tests are con­ducted by men who, like Mike, buy kits from the Inter­net or at the cor­ner Rite Aid, swab the inside of their cheeks and that of their puta­tive child’s and mail the sam­ples to a lab. Of course, the men who take the tests already ques­tion their pater­nity, and for about 30 per­cent of them, their hunch is right.

On the sur­face, this sounds incred­i­bly depress­ing to some­one who, like me, views mar­riage as a sacred, holy insti­tu­tion. But the sad real­ity is that eigh­teen per­cent of mar­ried women in the United States have cheated at least once. (The num­ber is prob­a­bly even higher since more than a few cheaters prob­a­bly lied to the poll­ster.) One in five Amer­i­cans — men and women — in monog­a­mous rela­tion­ships have cheated on his or her part­ner, accord­ing to the same sur­vey. With untold thou­sands of dol­lars on the line, can men really be blamed for want­ing to be sure?

This is yet another rea­son why Amer­i­can men are increas­ingly skep­ti­cal of mar­riage. Not only can wives divorce hus­bands for no rea­son and take half of their assets, courts can, as the Times arti­cle notes, also force hus­bands to pay for the chil­dren of the man with whom the wife cheated. Mod­ern soci­ety has devi­ated so much from the nat­ural order that chaos has resulted.

Related: The Bat­tle of the Sexes

(Hat tip: Roissy in DC)

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Men Liv­ing at Home
  2. Redun­dant, Oppressed Men
  3. Reveal­ing Clothing
  4. A Mother at 70
  5. Casual Sex Left Me Feel­ing So Worthless’

Tags:

No Comments so far ↓

  • Jeff

    The “nat­ural order” being “wives, sub­mit to thyne hus­bands”?  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sam Scott

    That’s a Chris­t­ian idea. Jew­ish women never sub­mit to their hus­bands. LOL.  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • The DNA Lady

    The bot­tom line is that each child deserves to start out life with the knowl­edge of his/her bio­log­i­cal par­ents. Irre­spec­tive of the bio­log­i­cal par­ents rela­tion­ship to each other and/or to the child — at least the child has a solid foun­da­tion on which to build his/her own life. Those of us lucky enough to know our ances­try will never know the empti­ness that ques­tion­able pater­nity and/or mater­nity cre­ates in chil­dren. I see count­less men and woman who have spent the bet­ter part of their adult lives try­ing to deter­mine who they are — all because “polite” soci­ety shamed their par­ents into not reveal­ing the truth.  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dan

    Mod­ern soci­ety? How do you define mod­ern soci­ety? For as long as humans have existed, peo­ple have “cheated” on their spouses. Humans aren’t ter­ri­bly monog­a­mous. I don’t think it’s any worse than it has been in the past. Through­out at least the Mid­dle Ages to mod­ern times mis­tresses, con­sorts, and other part­ners were accepted as part of the nat­ural order. Why is today so dif­fer­ent?  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Puma

    Jeff // 20 Novem­ber 2009 at 8:12 pm
    The “nat­ural order” being “wives, sub­mit to thyne husbands”?

    No Jeff, nat­ural order as in
    – Not reward­ing cheat­ing spouses with life­time alimony.
    – No reward­ing of proven per­pe­tra­tors of pater­nity fraud
    (when famous bankrob­bers Bon­nie & Clyde were caught, were the monies returned to the banks, or were they left with Bonnie’s kids — because you know they were like “inno­cent kids”?)

    Mod­ern Fam­ily Law is B.S.  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jeff

    Puma, I don’t know what your line of work or edu­ca­tional back­ground is, but in fact, it appears to me that mod­ern fam­ily law is fairer today to all par­ties than it has ever been in the past.  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sam Scott

    Both Puma and Jeff, to a degree, are correct.

    A long time ago — before there was any fam­ily law — women were largely at the mercy of their fathers and hus­bands. So women, to rate it math­e­mat­i­cally, were a –10 as far as legal pro­tec­tion. Now, how­ever, men are at a dis­ad­van­tage — but they are roughly at a –3 as far as legal protection.

    So, in sum, fam­ily law is more fair on aver­age, but men are now dis­crim­i­nated against.  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jeff

    Where are you get­ting these num­bers?  

    (Quote)

    UN:F [1.8.3_1051]
    Rat­ing: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Comment

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes