understanding politics, considerations

On Dogma


January 20th, 2010 · Christianity, Islam, Religion

Sam’s com­ment on my post On Reli­gion­ism, raises a valid point: just what, exactly, is reli­gion with­out dogma?  Two reli­gions may offer the key to under­stand­ing: Uni­tar­ian Uni­ver­sal­ism and the Bahá‘í Faith.

Dogma is often, at least among Chris­tians, suc­cinctly stated in a creed. Islam, too, has a creed, known as the aqi­dah.  Inter­est­ingly, among the three Abra­hamic reli­gions, Judaism is the only one with­out a creed, per se.  There are many rea­sons for this, among them a focus on ortho­praxy – “right prac­tice” – rather than ortho­doxy – “right belief.”  (Some, too, may say that the Shema Yis­rael is the Jew­ish creed; though, this opin­ion seems not to be uni­ver­sally accepted.)

A creed iden­ti­fies the basic beliefs, usu­ally meta­phys­i­cal, to which all adher­ents are sup­posed to hold.

Uni­tar­ian Uni­ver­sal­ists, how­ever, cel­e­brate their “faith with­out a creed.”  Instead, they advo­cate seven “prin­ci­ples” that do not define meta­phys­i­cal belief but rather rein­force what the UU com­mu­nity stands for.

Bahá‘ís, too, dis­count the value of creed.  From my quite lim­ited under­stand­ing, they acknowl­edge three basic truths: the unity of God, the unity of reli­gion, and the unity of humankind.  Apart from those truths, Bahá‘ís acknowl­edge that all peo­ples have received wis­dom that forms an incom­plete pic­ture of the Truth.  They, too, adhere to prin­ci­ples of right liv­ing and community-building.

The Eng­lish Puri­tan Richard Bax­ter once said, “In nec­es­sary things, unity; in doubt­ful things, lib­erty; in all things, char­ity.”  As a Catholic, albeit a quasi-heretical one (to be explained later), I find it ironic that a Puri­tan might utter such a phrase, but then, Bax­ter was not your aver­age zealot.  Regard­less, I think he spoke the truth.  The ques­tion begged is thus:

What things are necessary?

That ques­tion can – to a mind unen­cum­bered by alle­giance to Earthly insti­tu­tions, ortho­dox­ies, or ortho­prax­ies – have but one answer.  As even Sam has acknowl­edged, albeit within the con­text of Judaism, there can be many paths to Truth, but ulti­mately there is only one nec­es­sary belief:

“That which is hate­ful to you, do not unto another … The rest is com­men­tary — [and now] go study.”