understanding politics, considerations

What is Identity Now After Globalization?


February 24th, 2010 · Religion, World Affairs

what is identityJERUSALEM — When I was a pre-teen and teenager, I took ten­nis lessons at Oak Hill Coun­try Club (now closed) in Belleville, Illi­nois, and was later on my high school’s team for two years before my new­found pas­sions for jour­nal­ism and the Model U.N. took more of my time and interest.

My favorite play­ers at the time were Pete Sam­pras on the men’s side (since I also had a strong serve) and Mary Pierce on the women’s side (since she played for France, and I was learn­ing French in school). But what struck me as weird at the time was the fact that Pierce seemed to be a native Amer­i­can who, for some rea­son, sided with the French flag. (As I learned later, she was born in Mon­treal to a French mother and Amer­i­can father, raised in Amer­ica, and is a cit­i­zen of all three countries.)

what is identity

Although I did not real­ize it at the time, Pierce was my first intro­duc­tion to the glob­al­iza­tion of iden­tity that would become com­mon­place years later. In a glob­al­ized world, national iden­tity is increas­ingly a fluid, mat­ter of choice rather than fate — and many peo­ple, like myself, are choos­ing mul­ti­ple iden­ti­ties. (I am an Amer­i­can who moved to Israel and became a dual-citizen.)

A per­fect exam­ple is the Win­ter Olympics cur­rently occur­ring in Van­cou­ver, Canada. Israeli ice-dancers Roman and Alexan­dra Zaret­sky were born in Belarus but emi­grated to Israel as chil­dren and now per­form for the Star of David. Skater Tanith Bel­bin (pic­tured at the top) was born in Canada but now skates for the United States. Cathy Reed and her brother, Chris Reed, were born in Michi­gan to a Japan­ese mother and Amer­i­can father, but they have com­peted for both Japan and the United States at var­i­ous com­pe­ti­tions. Their other sis­ter, Alli­son Reed, com­petes for the coun­try of Geor­gia. And these are just a few examples.

what is identity

As I have writ­ten before, the idea of the nation-state — the foun­da­tion of the global order since the Treaty of West­phalia in 1648 — is slowly becom­ing irrel­e­vant as a result of immi­gra­tion and glob­al­iza­tion. The pop­u­la­tions of all coun­tries are becom­ing more het­ero­ge­neous, and a world­wide mar­ket for labor means that peo­ple are increas­ingly mov­ing else­where — as I noticed in Cairo — for work, edu­ca­tion, and their per­sonal lives.

And regard­less of a person’s offi­cial num­ber of cit­i­zen­ships, even the action of liv­ing in another coun­try can impart a sense of belong­ing. After watch­ing British tele­vi­sion while I was a child and then liv­ing, work­ing, and study­ing in Lon­don for a sum­mer dur­ing col­lege, I have some intan­gi­ble con­nec­tion to British cul­ture as well. I’d describe my per­son­al­ity as part Amer­i­can, British, and Israeli — if that makes any sense. When I speak Eng­lish in Israel, some­times my accent turns part-British when I’m speak­ing to native Britons or non-Britons who learned Eng­lish from a British teacher — and many Israelis think my Hebrew has a French accent (it’s all in the “r” or “ר”). I have sev­eral friends who are Fran­cophiles after study­ing the lan­guage and liv­ing in French-speaking coun­tries, and I would wager that they have some iden­tity with that nation­al­ity as well.

It’s all messy and com­pli­cated — but fas­ci­nat­ing and endear­ing as well.